english.elpais.com
Brazilian Film "I'm Still Here" Wins Golden Globe, Underscoring Nation's Past Trauma
Brazilian actress Fernanda Torres won a Golden Globe for her role in "I'm Still Here," a film about a woman whose husband disappeared during the 1970s military dictatorship; its release coincides with the anniversary of the attack on Brasília's seat of power, highlighting the film's resonance with Brazil's present.
- How does "I'm Still Here" connect Brazil's past trauma with its present political situation?
- The film's success highlights the enduring trauma of Brazil's dictatorship and its continued relevance in the current political climate. The film's popularity, drawing three million viewers in two months, underscores the need for reckoning with the past, particularly given former president Bolsonaro's attempts to downplay the dictatorship's atrocities.
- What is the significance of Fernanda Torres' Golden Globe win for Brazil and its ongoing political context?
- Fernanda Torres won the Golden Globe for Best Actress in a Drama Film for her role in "I'm Still Here," a film about a woman whose husband disappeared during Brazil's military dictatorship. This is Brazil's first Golden Globe win in this category, and the film's release coincides with the second anniversary of an attempted coup in Brasília.
- What are the long-term implications of the film's success for addressing historical injustices and promoting accountability in Brazil and beyond?
- The Golden Globe win and the film's widespread popularity suggest a growing international awareness of Brazil's history and the ongoing struggle for justice and accountability. This success may encourage further investigation into unresolved cases related to the dictatorship and inspire similar efforts to address historical injustices in other countries.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing consistently emphasizes the film's success and its political resonance within the context of Brazil's recent history. The headline itself highlights Fernanda Torres's unexpected win and her relatively low profile, which contributes to a narrative of triumph against the odds. The article's structure, prioritizing the film's cultural impact and political significance over other aspects, reinforces this framing. While this emphasis is understandable given the film's importance in Brazil, it might overshadow other potential interpretations or aspects of the story.
Language Bias
The language used is generally neutral and descriptive, although terms like "powerhouse lineup" to describe the other nominees could be seen as subtly biased, suggesting that Torres's win was an upset. The description of Bolsonaro as "an ex-general nostalgic for the dictatorship era" is a loaded phrase and could be softened to "a former general who has expressed interest in the country's past". Phrases such as "cultural phenomenon", "historic win", and "fierce advocate" are positive and emotive language, which shape reader perception.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the film's success and its cultural significance in Brazil, particularly in relation to the country's political history. However, it omits discussion of critical reviews or box office performance outside of Brazil. While acknowledging the film's significance within Brazil, the lack of broader international perspective could limit the reader's understanding of its overall impact. Additionally, the article could benefit from including more diverse voices beyond those directly connected to the film or the Paiva family. This omission might unintentionally create a narrative that overemphasizes a specific viewpoint.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a clear dichotomy between Bolsonaro's nostalgic view of the dictatorship and the film's condemnation of it. While this contrast is relevant, the narrative might benefit from exploring more nuanced perspectives on the dictatorship and its legacy in Brazil. It could also acknowledge that not all Brazilians share the same view on Bolsonaro or the dictatorship.
Gender Bias
The article focuses heavily on Fernanda Torres and Fernanda Montenegro, highlighting their familial connection and professional achievements. While this emphasis is appropriate given their involvement, the article could benefit from more explicit acknowledgement of the gendered dynamics within the film itself and in Brazilian cinema more broadly. Additionally, while the article mentions other female actresses, it does not provide significant detail about their roles in the film or their broader careers.
Sustainable Development Goals
The film 'I'm Still Here' sheds light on the human rights abuses during Brazil's military dictatorship, prompting reflection on justice and accountability. The film's success and the renewed public attention to the unresolved cases of those responsible for the disappearance of Rubens Paiva contribute to efforts towards justice and reconciliation. The "Dictatorship, never again!" chant highlights a societal rejection of authoritarianism. The film's release coinciding with the anniversaries of attacks on Brasília and the US Capitol underscores the importance of defending democratic institutions.