elmundo.es
Brazil's Illegal Lottery: Jogo do Bicho Generates €250 Million Annually
Jogo do bicho, Brazil's illegal animal lottery, generates €250 million annually, operating through a hierarchical structure involving bankers, regional bosses, and street vendors, with deep ties to political and military figures, despite facing only minor penalties for organizers.
- How does the jogo do bicho's connection with political and military figures affect law enforcement efforts to control it?
- The jogo do bicho's hierarchical structure includes bankers at the top, regional bosses (bicheiros) controlling territories, and street vendors. This structure facilitates money laundering and ties to political and military power, hindering law enforcement efforts. The relatively lenient penalties—four months to a year in prison—further contribute to its longevity.
- What is the annual revenue generated by Jogo do Bicho, and how does its structure contribute to its persistence despite its illegal status?
- Jogo do bicho, Brazil's illegal lottery, generates an estimated €250 million annually. It involves choosing numbers associated with animals, with payouts based on the Brazilian Federal Lottery. The game's persistence stems from its vast network of betting points and social acceptance, fueled by its sponsorship of popular events.
- What are the potential future trends of Jogo do Bicho, given the increasing role of online gambling and the ongoing violent conflicts between competing groups?
- Future trends may include increased online gambling, mirroring the actions of pioneers like Rogério de Andrade. The intense competition for control, exemplified by violent conflicts between families like the García sisters and their associates, suggests ongoing instability and potential for further violence. The deep-rooted connections with political and law enforcement figures will likely impede significant change.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The narrative heavily emphasizes the criminal aspects of Jogo do Bicho from the outset. The description of its origins and the comparison to lotteries like Spain's Lotería Nacional are brief and serve primarily to contrast with the subsequent portrayal of violence and corruption. The headline (if there was one) likely would reinforce this negative framing.
Language Bias
The article uses strong, negative language to describe Jogo do Bicho and its participants repeatedly referring to 'criminal aspects', 'violent', 'illegal', 'corrupt' etc. While accurate, this repeated negative framing shapes the reader's perception. More neutral language could be used in certain instances to convey the facts without such strong negative connotations.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the criminal aspects of Jogo do Bicho, potentially omitting the perspectives of players who see it as a harmless form of entertainment or a source of income. It also doesn't delve into the social and economic factors that contribute to its popularity, such as lack of access to other forms of gambling or entertainment. The article might benefit from including these counterpoints for a more balanced perspective.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a dichotomy between the 'harmless' lottery-like nature of the game and its deep involvement in organized crime, but it simplifies the complex reality of the situation. There is a spectrum of involvement and motivations, from casual players to high-level organizers, that the text doesn't fully explore.
Gender Bias
While the article mentions several powerful women involved in Jogo do Bicho, it also focuses on their involvement in violent conflicts and family disputes, potentially reinforcing gender stereotypes. The article could benefit from a more balanced portrayal of women's roles in the game, beyond their involvement in violence.
Sustainable Development Goals
The Jogo do Bicho, while providing some economic activity, significantly contributes to inequality. Its illegal nature allows powerful figures to accumulate wealth through exploitation and violence, exacerbating the gap between rich and poor. The article highlights how the game's leaders use profits to fund political campaigns and community outreach, creating a facade of social responsibility while maintaining a system of oppression and inequality.