Burglar Convicted of Manslaughter After Running Over Victim

Burglar Convicted of Manslaughter After Running Over Victim

bbc.com

Burglar Convicted of Manslaughter After Running Over Victim

Errol Woodger, 38, was found guilty of manslaughter at the Old Bailey for running over and killing 51-year-old Marc Allen with Allen's own Mercedes after a burglary at Allen's Erith flat on December 29, 2019.

English
United Kingdom
JusticeOtherUk CrimeManslaughterLondonBurglaryCar CrimeOld Bailey
Motability Car Scheme
Errol WoodgerMarc Allen
How did the previous illness and use of a Motability vehicle by the victim, Marc Allen, impact the circumstances of the incident?
Woodger's actions directly resulted from a burglary at Allen's flat where his car keys were stolen. Allen's attempt to stop Woodger led to him being struck and killed by the stolen Mercedes. The incident highlights the potential deadly consequences of burglary and resisting theft.
What were the immediate consequences of the burglary committed by Errol Woodger, and what specific actions led to the death of Marc Allen?
On December 29, 2019, Errol Woodger, 38, was convicted of manslaughter for running over Marc Allen, 51, with Allen's own car after a burglary. Allen, who had a prosthetic leg, died from injuries sustained in the incident. Woodger will be sentenced at a later date.
What broader implications does this case have regarding the potential for violence during property crimes, and what measures could be implemented to mitigate similar incidents in the future?
This case underscores the severity of consequences associated with violent crimes stemming from property theft. Woodger's prior convictions for robbery and attempted robbery suggest a pattern of criminal behavior. The use of the victim's own vehicle as a weapon adds a particularly heinous element to the crime, raising concerns about escalating violence in such situations.

Cognitive Concepts

1/5

Framing Bias

The framing of the article is largely neutral. The headline accurately reflects the outcome of the trial. The article presents both the prosecution's case and the defendant's defense, although it does focus primarily on the prosecution's account of events. The inclusion of details like the victim's use of the Motability scheme and the description of the crime could subtly influence reader perception by humanizing the victim and emphasizing the severity of the crime. However, this is not overly manipulative.

1/5

Language Bias

The language used in the article is largely neutral and objective. The use of terms like "burglar" and "robbery" are accurate descriptions, though one could argue that the repeated description of the vehicle as a "weapon" might subtly sway reader opinion. However, this choice is arguably justified within the context of the prosecution's case. Alternatives could include 'car used in the escape' or 'vehicle involved in the incident'.

2/5

Bias by Omission

The article could benefit from including information about the sentencing of Errol Woodger. Also, while the article mentions Woodger's prior convictions, it doesn't elaborate on the nature of these crimes or their relevance to the current case. This omission could leave the reader with an incomplete picture of the defendant's background and the context of the crime.

Sustainable Development Goals

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions Positive
Direct Relevance

The conviction and sentencing of Errol Woodger for manslaughter and robbery demonstrate the functioning of the justice system in bringing perpetrators to account for violent crimes. This contributes to SDG 16, Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions, by upholding the rule of law and ensuring accountability for criminal acts.