faz.net
Burgtheater's "Liliom": An Inverted Narrative and Powerful Performances
Philipp Stölzl's production of Ferenc Molnár's "Liliom" at the Vienna Burgtheater inverts the narrative structure, highlighting the characters' precariousness and eliciting significant audience acclaim. Stefanie Reinsperger's powerful performance emphasizes Liliom's vulnerability over his brutality.
- What is the central innovation of Stölzl's "Liliom" production at the Burgtheater, and what are its immediate impacts on the narrative and audience experience?
- "Liliom", a 1909 play by Ferenc Molnár, receives a unique interpretation at Vienna's Burgtheater. Director Philipp Stölzl inverts the traditional narrative structure, showcasing the angels from the final scene at the beginning, creating a backward and forward movement throughout the performance. Stefanie Reinsperger delivers a powerful portrayal of Liliom, the carousel barker, highlighting his brutality as a product of fear and self-doubt, not solely as a demonstration of male violence.
- How does Stölzl's staging reinterpret the characters' social standing and their relationship with their environment, and what are the consequences for the play's overall message?
- Stölzl's production emphasizes the characters' precariousness and lack of grounding, contrasting with the original setting. The play becomes a poignant depiction of lost souls, unintentionally humorous in their desperate search for stability, evoking audience sympathy. This resonates with the play's enduring popularity, evident in the enthusiastic Viennese reception.
- What are the long-term implications of this production's approach to the themes of violence, vulnerability, and social alienation, and how might it influence future interpretations of Molnár's work?
- The success of this production stems from its insightful exploration of human vulnerability and the complexities of relationships. By avoiding simplistic interpretations of violence and focusing on underlying anxieties, Stölzl's staging encourages deeper reflection on the characters' struggles and societal context. This approach ensures the play's continued relevance in a contemporary setting.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The review frames the play through the lens of its theatrical production, emphasizing the director's choices and the actors' performances. This framing might unintentionally overshadow the play's inherent merit. The positive tone focuses on the success of the staging, potentially downplaying potential criticisms of the interpretation.
Language Bias
The language used is largely descriptive and appreciative, but terms like "Nichtsnutz" (good-for-nothing) and "Sau" (sow) are used to describe Liliom. While these reflect the play's characterization, offering context or neutral alternatives would strengthen the analysis.
Bias by Omission
The review focuses heavily on the acting and directing choices, potentially omitting analysis of the play's themes or societal context. It mentions the play's enduring appeal but doesn't delve into why those themes resonate across time. This omission limits the analysis's scope and might prevent discussion of potential biases embedded in the original text.
Gender Bias
The review notes Reinsperger's performance as Liliom, highlighting how the actor transcends gender expectations. However, it doesn't analyze whether the play itself perpetuates gender stereotypes or imbalances. A deeper examination of gender dynamics within the source material would improve the analysis.
Sustainable Development Goals
The play explores themes of social inequality and the struggles of marginalized individuals, highlighting the disparities between different social classes and their impact on individual lives. The characters are depicted as lost and lacking societal support, reflecting the challenges faced by vulnerable populations and the need for social safety nets. The positive impact stems from raising awareness of such inequalities.