lemonde.fr
Calm in Damascus After Assad's Departure, Hayat Tahrir Al-Cham Assumes Control
On September 9th, following Bashar Al-Assad's departure, Damascus saw calm after previous day's violence. Rebel group Hayat Tahrir Al-Cham secured government buildings, despite some being damaged, and now controls the streets with checkpoints and curfews, though traffic resumed, with citizens exchanging cigarettes.
- What immediate changes are observable in Damascus following the departure of Bashar Al-Assad?
- "Following the departure of Bashar Al-Assad, Damascus experienced a calm morning on September 9th, a stark contrast to the previous day's chaos. Rebel soldiers secured government buildings, claiming to protect state property despite evidence of damage. Traffic resumed, with citizens openly exchanging cigarettes, a previously scarce commodity.
- How do the actions of the rebel group Hayat Tahrir Al-Cham indicate a broader shift in control within the capital?
- The rebels' control is evident in checkpoints and identity checks, particularly at night under a 4 PM curfew, though compliance is inconsistent. Vehicles from previously restricted areas like Idlib and Aleppo are now visible, indicating a shift in power dynamics within the city.
- What are the potential long-term implications of Hayat Tahrir Al-Cham's takeover of Damascus, considering the destruction of government buildings and the current situation?
- The incident highlights Hayat Tahrir Al-Cham's (HTC) growing influence and control over Damascus. While they claim not to be responsible for damages, the destruction of state buildings may signal the removal of evidence. The long-term implications of HTC's rule and its impact on the stability of Damascus remain uncertain.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing emphasizes the restoration of order and normality under HTC's control, highlighting the return of traffic and social interactions. This positive portrayal of HTC's actions could be seen as biased, particularly given their Islamist background. The headline (if any) would significantly influence this.
Language Bias
While the article maintains a relatively neutral tone, the description of the rebels as "assuring" and the use of the term "dictator" to describe Assad could be considered loaded language, subtly influencing reader perception. The direct quote from a rebel officer, while factual, is presented without critical evaluation of potential bias.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the immediate aftermath of Assad's departure and the actions of Hayat Tahrir Al-Cham (HTC), potentially omitting other significant actors or perspectives in the Syrian conflict. The long-term consequences and the perspectives of other groups or civilians are not addressed. There is no mention of international reactions or implications.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplified picture of the situation, focusing on the contrast between the chaos of the previous day and the relative calm of the current day. The complexity of the political and social situation is reduced, and nuanced perspectives are largely absent.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article describes the takeover of Damascus by Hayat Tahrir Al-Cham (HTC), an Islamist armed group. This event undermines peace and stability, disrupts established institutions, and raises concerns about human rights and the rule of law. The presence of armed groups controlling checkpoints and conducting identity checks points to a breakdown in security and justice systems. The destruction of government buildings also indicates a lack of respect for established institutions.