liberation.fr
Campus Condorcet Event Challenges Eurocentric Universalism
Campus Condorcet hosts a three-day event (March 20-22, 2025) on "Universal(s)?", featuring decolonial studies from Latin America and the Caribbean that critique Eurocentric universalism and propose alternative models emphasizing shared human concerns and interphilosophical dialogue.
- How do the diverse approaches within decolonial thought relate to each other, and what common threads or points of divergence can be identified?
- Decolonial thinkers, despite their diverse approaches, share a common critique of Eurocentric universalism rooted in their academic training and experiences. While some initially emphasized the unique identities of colonized societies, others, like Anibal Quijano and Enrique Dussel, propose alternative concepts of universalism, focusing on shared human problems and interphilosophical dialogue.
- What are the potential long-term impacts of incorporating decolonial perspectives into future discussions about universalism and global interconnectedness?
- The event highlights a shift away from a detached universalism that no longer resonates internationally or domestically in France. The discussions will explore alternative models of universalism proposed by decolonial thinkers, emphasizing shared human concerns while acknowledging the historical context of philosophical traditions. This emphasizes the need for a more inclusive, transmodern philosophy.
- What are the central arguments of decolonial scholars concerning universalism, and what are the immediate implications of their critiques for global philosophical discourse?
- The Campus Condorcet is hosting a three-day event from March 20-22, 2025, focusing on the theme of "Universal(s)?", partnering with Libération. Decolonial studies from Latin America and the Caribbean challenge the Eurocentric nature of universalism, arguing that modernity and coloniality are inseparable since 1492. This perspective critiques a detached universalism developed in Europe since the 17th century.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article presents a balanced view of decolonial thought, acknowledging both its critiques of Eurocentric universalism and its potential for contributing to a more inclusive universalism. While it highlights the contributions of specific decolonial thinkers, it does so to illustrate the diversity of perspectives within the movement rather than to promote a specific agenda. The title, "Universel(s)?", already signals an openness to multiple perspectives.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral and academic. While terms like "surplomb" (overlooking) might be considered slightly loaded, they are used in the context of a specific philosophical debate. Overall, the language strives for objectivity.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses on decolonial studies from Latin America and the Caribbean, but it might omit other relevant perspectives on universalism from different geographical regions or philosophical traditions. The absence of counterarguments to the critiques of Eurocentric universalism could also be considered a bias by omission, although the author does acknowledge the diversity of decolonial thought. The article also doesn't deeply explore potential limitations or criticisms of decolonial approaches themselves.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article discusses decolonial studies which critique the Eurocentric nature of hegemonic social sciences. Promoting diverse perspectives in education is crucial for inclusive and quality education for all. The call to engage with decolonial thought fosters critical thinking and challenges dominant narratives, thereby enriching the educational landscape and aligning with SDG 4 (Quality Education).