lemonde.fr
Canal+ to Leave French TNT by Mid-2025
On December 5th, 2024, Canal+ announced it will remove its pay-TV channels from French Digital Terrestrial Television (TNT) by mid-2025, citing a €655.6 million tax dispute, regulatory changes, and the removal of C8 from TNT.
- What is the immediate impact of Canal+'s decision to withdraw from French TNT?
- Canal+ will remove its channels from French Digital Terrestrial Television (TNT) by mid-2025, ending its 40-year presence on the platform. This decision impacts Canal+, Canal+ Cinema, Canal+ Sport, and Planète, following disagreements with French regulators over taxes and C8's license removal. The move reflects a broader strategic shift away from TNT.
- How do the tax dispute and C8's license removal contribute to Canal+'s decision?
- Canal+'s withdrawal is driven by a tax dispute with the French government, contesting a €655.6 million tax bill and potential TVA rate changes. The company claims that the Arcom's decision to remove C8 from TNT also negatively impacts their paid channels' viability, though this is contested by industry players. The situation highlights ongoing tensions between media companies and French regulators.
- What are the potential long-term consequences of Canal+'s departure from TNT for the French media market?
- Canal+'s exit signals a potential shift in the French media landscape, with implications for both viewers and the broader media market. This move could encourage other pay-TV providers to reassess their TNT presence or influence future regulatory discussions on media taxation and licensing in France. The long-term effects on French television remain to be seen.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames Canal+'s decision as a reaction to unfair treatment by the French government, highlighting their complaints about taxes and regulations. The headline and introduction emphasize Canal+'s grievances, potentially shaping the reader's perception of the situation as one of victimhood rather than a strategic business decision.
Language Bias
The article uses emotionally charged language in several instances, particularly in describing Canal+'s tone as "courroucé" (angry) and quoting their claims of being "pénalisée" (penalized). The use of such language favors Canal+'s narrative. More neutral phrasing would be beneficial.
Bias by Omission
The article presents Canal+'s perspective prominently, but omits the viewpoints of other stakeholders who might disagree with their assessment of the situation. For example, the article mentions an unnamed industry actor who dismisses the connection between C8's removal and Canal+'s decision as a "joke," but doesn't elaborate on this actor's reasoning or identify them. The article also presents the CNC's denial of increased tax pressure without fully exploring the details of the ongoing dispute.
False Dichotomy
The article frames the situation as a simple cause-and-effect relationship between the removal of C8, tax increases, and Canal+'s decision to leave TNT. This oversimplifies a complex issue with multiple contributing factors and ignores potential alternative explanations for Canal+'s strategy.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights Canal+'s claim that increased taxes and regulatory changes negatively impact their business, potentially exacerbating economic inequalities if it leads to job losses or reduced investment in the cultural sector. The dispute over TVA rates suggests a potential imbalance in the application of tax policies, affecting a major player in the French media landscape disproportionately.