dw.com
CDU/CSU Support Plummets After Far-Right Alliance
A Forsa poll shows Germany's CDU/CSU alliance's support fell to 28%, its lowest since October 2023, after CDU's Merz cooperated with the far-right AfD on a border policy resolution, sparking protests; the AfD is at 20%, SPD at 16%, and Greens at 15%.
- How did public reaction, as demonstrated by the protests, influence the CDU/CSU's standing and Merz's approval ratings?
- Merz's actions caused a significant shift in public opinion. His alliance with the far-right on key policies, culminating in a parliamentary defeat on an immigration bill, damaged his credibility. This is reflected in his falling approval ratings, now equal to the Green's Habeck. The protests underscore public disapproval of this political strategy.
- What is the immediate impact of Friedrich Merz's cooperation with the far-right AfD on the CDU/CSU's poll ratings and electoral prospects?
- Germany's CDU/CSU alliance saw its support drop to 28% in a recent Forsa poll, a two-point decrease and its lowest rating since October 2023. This decline follows CDU candidate Friedrich Merz's controversial cooperation with the far-right AfD on a border policy resolution, sparking nationwide protests. The AfD remains at 20%, while the SPD holds steady at 16% and the Greens gained a point to 15%.
- What are the potential long-term consequences of this political strategy for the German political landscape and the stability of future coalition governments?
- The CDU/CSU's dwindling support highlights the risks of cooperating with the far-right. Merz's attempts to distance himself may prove insufficient to regain lost ground before the February 23rd elections. The close race and the struggle of several parties to clear the 5% electoral threshold indicate potential political instability following the election.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The headline and initial paragraphs emphasize the drop in CDU/CSU support and Merz's controversial alliance with the far-right. This framing immediately sets a negative tone and directs the reader's focus towards the perceived failures of Merz and his party. The repeated mention of the far-right's involvement and Merz's attempts to distance himself strengthens this negative framing. The inclusion of contrasting poll data from a different institute adds some balance, but the initial negative framing still dominates.
Language Bias
The article uses terms like "historic breach of taboo," "major political defeat," and "slide in popularity" which carry negative connotations. While factually accurate, these choices contribute to a negative portrayal of Merz and the CDU/CSU. More neutral alternatives could include phrases such as "unprecedented political decision," "parliamentary rejection," and "decrease in support." The repetition of "far-right" also contributes to a negative bias.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the CDU/CSU's declining poll numbers and Merz's actions, but provides limited analysis of the broader political climate or the potential reasons behind the shifts in public opinion beyond Merz's controversial alliances. It mentions other parties' poll standings but doesn't delve into their platforms or strategies. The omission of a deeper dive into the policy specifics of the immigration bill could affect reader understanding of the context surrounding the controversy.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplified view of the political landscape, focusing primarily on the CDU/CSU's decline and the AfD's consistent polling numbers. It doesn't fully explore the nuances of the multi-party system or the potential for coalition governments. The implied dichotomy is between Merz's actions and the resulting drop in support, without fully exploring alternative factors.
Gender Bias
The article mentions several political leaders, both male and female, without exhibiting overt gender bias in its language or focus. However, it primarily focuses on the actions and approval ratings of the male candidates (Merz, Scholz), with Alice Weidel's relatively stable ratings receiving less detailed attention. More balanced coverage across all candidates, regardless of gender, would be beneficial.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights a decline in support for the CDU/CSU due to their cooperation with the far-right AfD on border policy. This collaboration undermines democratic institutions and the rule of law, negatively impacting peace and stability. The subsequent parliamentary rejection of the immigration bill further underscores this instability. The actions of the CDU/CSU threaten to normalize the influence of extremist ideologies within the political system, posing a risk to democratic governance and social cohesion. The low approval ratings reflect public disapproval of this approach.