
elpais.com
Censorship Fuels Sales of Brazilian Novel Addressing Racism
Jeferson Tenório's novel, "El reverso de la piel," addressing racism in Brazil, sold over 280,000 copies and faced censorship from far-right groups after its inclusion in school curriculums, resulting in increased sales and international recognition.
- How did the far-right's attempts to censor "El reverso de la piel" impact its sales and international reach?
- The book's popularity and censorship reflect a broader societal struggle against racism and conservative political agendas in Brazil. The far-right's attempts to suppress the book, including accusations of pornography and low-quality vocabulary, resulted in increased sales and international recognition, demonstrating the power of literary resistance against censorship.
- What is the significance of the controversy surrounding Jeferson Tenório's "El reverso de la piel" in the context of contemporary Brazilian politics?
- Jeferson Tenório, a Brazilian author, published "El reverso de la piel" (The Reverse of the Skin), a novel addressing racism in Brazil, which has sold over 280,000 copies and sparked controversy among far-right groups. The book's success and subsequent censorship highlight the ongoing tension between progressive social movements and conservative backlash in Brazil.
- What are the long-term implications of the censorship and subsequent success of "El reverso de la piel" for freedom of expression and the literary landscape in Brazil?
- Tenório's experience, including death threats and digital lynching, underscores the significant influence of online discourse on real-world events in Brazil. The book's translation into multiple languages signals a growing global awareness of issues concerning racism and the struggle for social justice in Brazil, extending beyond the national context.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the narrative around the censorship and success of Tenório's book, highlighting the attacks against it and the author's resilience. This framing emphasizes the struggle against censorship and the book's triumph over adversity, potentially overshadowing other relevant aspects of the story. The headline (if there were one) would heavily influence this framing.
Language Bias
While generally neutral, the article uses some loaded language such as describing certain groups as 'those who find radical leftism in anything approaching the vindication of rights' and referring to the attacks as a 'lynching.' The use of 'berrinche' (tantrum) to describe the reaction of those who oppose the book could be seen as loaded. More neutral alternatives could include phrases like 'those who oppose the book's message', 'online attacks', and 'strong negative reaction'.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the censorship and attacks against Tenório's work, but offers limited detail on the political context surrounding Bolsonaro and Milei, and their actions. While the article mentions their gifts and Musk's salute, it lacks deeper analysis of their political ideologies and the broader implications of their actions. This omission could leave readers with an incomplete understanding of the motivations behind the attacks on Tenório's book.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplistic dichotomy between the 'conservative' forces attacking Tenório and the forces supporting him, primarily those within the Brazilian cultural sphere. It doesn't fully explore the nuances of Brazilian politics or the potential existence of varied opinions within either group.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights the success of "El reverso de la piel", a novel tackling racism, despite censorship attempts by the Brazilian far-right. This success, including increased sales and international recognition, signifies a positive impact on reducing inequalities by promoting anti-racist discourse and challenging discriminatory narratives. The book's inclusion in school curricula further contributes to raising awareness and fostering inclusivity.