apnews.com
Census Bureau Seeks to Remove Gender Identity Questions from Survey
The U.S. Census Bureau requested permission to remove gender identity questions from its Household Pulse Survey, aligning with President Trump's executive order restricting funding for programs promoting "gender ideology", which conflicts with the American Medical Association's position on sex and gender as a spectrum.
- How does the Census Bureau's action reflect broader policy changes under the Trump administration?
- This action aligns with President Trump's broader policy to define sex as strictly male or female, contradicting scientific consensus on sex and gender as a spectrum. This decision follows other executive orders targeting transgender and nonbinary individuals, several of which are facing legal challenges.
- What are the potential long-term implications of excluding gender identity questions from major surveys?
- The potential impact extends beyond this specific survey. The Census Bureau's decision could affect the 2027 American Community Survey and future data collection efforts on gender identity. This could lead to inaccurate representations of the American population and hinder research on gender-related issues.
- What is the immediate consequence of the Census Bureau's request to remove gender identity questions from its survey?
- The U.S. Census Bureau requested permission to remove gender identity questions from its Household Pulse Survey to comply with President Trump's executive order restricting funding for programs promoting "gender ideology.", A2=
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing is clearly negative toward the Trump administration's actions. The headline (if there were one) would likely emphasize the attempt to remove questions about gender identity. The article starts by highlighting the attempt to delete questions, reinforcing a critical viewpoint from the outset. The inclusion of Trump's broader targeting of transgender and nonbinary people further strengthens this negative framing.
Language Bias
The article uses neutral language in reporting the facts, but the selection and sequencing of information leans towards a critical portrayal of the administration's decision. Words like "stripping," "targeted," and "blocked" contribute to this negative tone, even though they are factual representations of events.
Bias by Omission
The article omits discussion of potential benefits or alternative perspectives on the Trump administration's actions regarding gender identity questions in the census. It focuses heavily on the negative consequences and criticisms, leaving out any potential justifications or counterarguments from the administration's viewpoint. The lack of this context limits the reader's ability to form a fully informed opinion.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a false dichotomy by framing the debate as solely between a binary definition of sex (male/female) and a spectrum approach. It overlooks potential alternative frameworks or nuanced positions that might exist beyond these two extremes. This simplifies the issue and may not accurately represent the complexity of the debate.
Gender Bias
The article does not exhibit overt gender bias in its language or representation. However, the focus on the Trump administration's actions concerning gender identity could be interpreted as implicitly centering the concerns of transgender and nonbinary individuals, potentially marginalizing other perspectives or groups within the larger conversation surrounding gender identity.
Sustainable Development Goals
The Trump administration's attempt to remove gender identity questions from the Household Trends and Outlook Pulse Survey and potentially the American Community Survey directly undermines efforts to collect data necessary for understanding and addressing gender inequality. The administration's definition of sex as only male or female ignores the spectrum of gender identities and experiences, hindering accurate representation and policymaking related to LGBTQ+ individuals. This action also reflects a broader pattern of policies targeting transgender and nonbinary people, further exacerbating existing inequalities.