es.euronews.com
ChatGPT Usage Primarily for Daily Tasks, OpenAI Study Reveals
A new OpenAI study analyzing 1.5 million ChatGPT conversations from May 2024 to June 2025 found that 70% of ChatGPT usage is for daily tasks, with 30% related to work, highlighting its role in personal and professional life.
- What are the key findings of OpenAI's study on ChatGPT usage?
- The study reveals that 70% of ChatGPT usage is for daily tasks creating economic value, while 30% is work-related. Three out of four conversations involved practical guidance, information seeking, and writing. Nearly half were questions, indicating users value ChatGPT as an advisor.
- How is ChatGPT used in professional settings, according to the study?
- Professionals, often highly educated, use ChatGPT primarily for writing tasks (editing, critiquing, translating), rather than generating content from scratch. Coding and self-expression remain niche applications (4% of queries). ChatGPT aids decision-making and improves productivity, especially in knowledge-intensive jobs.
- What trends or future implications are highlighted in the report regarding ChatGPT usage?
- The report shows a significant increase in female ChatGPT users, from 37% in 2024 to 52% in 2025. The prevalence of ChatGPT for daily tasks suggests a growing integration into personal and professional routines, signifying a potential shift in how information is accessed and tasks are completed.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article presents a balanced overview of ChatGPT usage, highlighting both professional and personal applications. The focus on 'everyday tasks' in the headline and introduction might subtly downplay the significant professional use (30%), but this is balanced by detailed breakdown of work-related activities later. There's no overt attempt to frame the findings to favor a particular viewpoint.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral and objective. Terms like "everyday tasks" could be considered slightly vague, but they are followed by more precise descriptions. There is no use of loaded language or emotionally charged terms.
Bias by Omission
The study's methodology (random sample of 1.5 million conversations) is mentioned, but further details on data collection and potential biases are absent. While the report notes that women are increasingly using ChatGPT, it doesn't analyze potential reasons or gender-based differences in usage patterns. The lack of information on geographic location of users is also a potential omission.
Gender Bias
The article notes the increasing use of ChatGPT by women, showing a positive trend. However, it doesn't delve into a deeper analysis of gender differences in usage patterns or potential underlying reasons, representing an area for potential improvement.
Sustainable Development Goals
The increased use of ChatGPT by women (rising from 37% in 2024 to 52% in 2025) suggests a potential positive impact on gender equality in access to and benefit from technological advancements. While not directly addressing gender inequality, the trend indicates a reduction in the gender gap in technology usage, which can contribute to bridging other inequalities in the long term.