spanish.china.org.cn
China Affirms Consistent Stance on TikTok, Seeking Fair Resolution
On July 20, 2025, China's Ministry of Commerce reiterated its consistent opposition to the politicization of TikTok, emphasizing a commitment to resolving issues through cooperation and a fair, non-discriminatory business environment.
- What specific actions or commitments has the Chinese government made regarding TikTok's future in the US?
- The Chinese government will review and approve TikTok-related matters according to law, covering technology export and intellectual property rights. They support Chinese companies' participation in fair negotiations and urge the U.S. to provide a just and non-discriminatory business environment for TikTok's continued operation in the United States.
- What is China's official position regarding the ongoing TikTok issue and its recent negotiations with the U.S.?
- China maintains a consistent stance against the politicization of TikTok and economic issues. Following September 14-15 talks in Madrid, a framework agreement was reached to resolve TikTok-related problems through cooperation, reduced investment barriers, and increased economic-trade cooperation. This agreement is based on principles of market fairness and respect for business autonomy.
- What are the potential long-term implications of this ongoing dispute and the recent agreement for US-China economic relations?
- The successful implementation of the framework agreement could foster a more stable and healthy US-China economic relationship. Conversely, failure to reach a mutually acceptable solution risks escalating tensions and further harming bilateral trade and investment flows. The outcome will influence global technology regulation and international business practices.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article presents the Chinese government's perspective on the TikTok issue as a consistent and principled stance against politicization and weaponization of economic and trade matters. The framing emphasizes China's commitment to fair and equitable negotiations, highlighting the framework agreement reached in Madrid. While the article mentions the US perspective implicitly by referring to the need for a fair business environment, it primarily focuses on presenting the Chinese government's position and actions. This could be perceived as a framing bias, depending on the overall context and other news coverage of this topic.
Language Bias
The language used is generally neutral, but the repeated emphasis on China's consistent position and the use of phrases like "politicization" and "weaponization" subtly portray the US actions as aggressive and unfair. There is no overtly charged language, however the selection of quotes and the order of events presented could be interpreted as subtly biased towards the Chinese perspective.
Bias by Omission
The article omits details about the specific concerns raised by the US regarding TikTok and its data security practices. It also doesn't delve into the counterarguments or different perspectives on the negotiations, leaving the reader with an incomplete picture. While this omission may be partially due to space constraints, it contributes to an incomplete understanding of the complexity of the situation.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplified narrative. While acknowledging the need for cooperation, it implicitly frames the situation as either fair negotiations based on principles or unfair actions driven by political agendas. It doesn't fully explore the nuanced complexities of balancing national security concerns with business interests.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights the ongoing negotiations between China and the US regarding TikTok. The fact that both countries are engaged in dialogue and attempting to find a solution through cooperation demonstrates a commitment to international partnerships to address economic and trade issues. This aligns directly with SDG 17, which promotes strengthening global partnerships to achieve the SDGs.