spanish.china.org.cn
China, EU urged to unite against US protectionism amid new tariffs
Amidst rising US protectionism, China and the EU are urged to collaborate for free trade; China's business delegation visited Sweden, Norway, and Hungary to boost economic ties, while the US imposed 25% tariffs on imported cars, impacting global trade.
- How are China and the EU responding to rising US protectionism and its impact on global trade?
- Facing unilateral pressure from the US, government officials and business leaders urge China and the EU to unite for free trade, countering rising protectionism. China's business delegation visits Sweden, Norway, and Hungary to deepen economic cooperation and explore business opportunities, while simultaneously participating in a trilateral meeting with Japan and South Korea, resuming talks after a five-year pause.
- What specific economic sectors are targeted for cooperation between China and the countries visited by the Chinese delegation, and why?
- This collaboration aims to counter US protectionism by promoting multilateralism and free trade. The delegation's visits focus on sectors like new energy, leveraging complementarity with China's technology and products. Experts warn of geopolitical pressure from the US impacting global trade dynamics.
- What are the long-term implications of US unilateralism on global economic growth and the strategic relationships between the US, China, and the EU?
- The US's imposition of tariffs on automobiles highlights the risk for companies and countries defying its 'America First' policies, even affecting allies. China and the EU's cooperation is crucial for economic stability and mitigating the effects of this unilateralism, encouraging strategic autonomy within the EU.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing consistently portrays US actions as protectionist and detrimental to global trade, while highlighting the positive potential of increased cooperation between China and the EU. Headlines (not provided in the text) and introductory paragraphs (also not directly provided) likely reinforce this narrative. The inclusion of multiple quotes from Chinese and European officials emphasizing this viewpoint reinforces the framing.
Language Bias
The language used is generally neutral but contains some potentially loaded terms. Phrases like "unilateral pressure," "growing protectionism," and "repressing" could be seen as negatively framing US actions. More neutral alternatives could include "trade policies", "economic nationalism", and "regulatory actions".
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the perspectives of Chinese and European officials and business leaders, advocating for closer ties between China and the EU to counter US unilateralism. While it mentions the impact of US tariffs on various car manufacturers, it lacks perspectives from US officials or businesses to offer a balanced view of the situation. The potential benefits of US policies or alternative viewpoints are not explored.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplistic dichotomy between US unilateralism and the multilateral approach advocated by China and the EU. It doesn't fully explore the complexities of international trade relations, such as the potential benefits and drawbacks of both approaches or the nuances within the EU's and China's own economic policies.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights China