africa.chinadaily.com.cn
China, Japan, and South Korea Urged to Finalize Trilateral FTA
The urgent need for a China-Japan-ROK free trade agreement (FTA) is highlighted, countering US protectionism and boosting regional economic growth, particularly in services trade, to upgrade the RCEP framework; the combined economic size of these three countries in 2024 was $24.64 trillion.
- How does the proposed FTA address the challenges posed by US unilateralism and trade protectionism?
- The proposed China-Japan-ROK FTA is crucial for countering the negative impacts of US trade policies, which violate WTO principles and threaten global economic fragmentation. This FTA offers a strategic response, promoting regional stability and economic cooperation.
- What are the immediate economic benefits and global implications of a finalized China-Japan-ROK FTA?
- China, Japan, and South Korea face shared challenges, necessitating a trilateral free trade agreement (FTA) to boost their economies and revitalize regional and global growth. The failure of US-led globalization highlights the urgency of this FTA as a counter to rising protectionism and unilateralism.
- What are the long-term impacts of this FTA on regional economic integration and the global economic order?
- A successful China-Japan-ROK FTA will not only stimulate economic growth but also serve as a model for higher-level regional economic integration, particularly upgrading the RCEP. Prioritizing services trade and aligning standards are key to success, transforming complementarities into growth momentum.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The narrative heavily favors the benefits of the trilateral FTA, presenting it as a necessary and beneficial step for all involved parties. The headline (not provided, but implied) would likely emphasize the positive aspects. The introduction sets a positive tone, highlighting mutual challenges and the need for joint effort. This framing may lead readers to overlook potential risks or downsides.
Language Bias
The language used is largely positive and assertive regarding the FTA, using words like "imperative," "boost," "vitality," and "key move." While this is persuasive, it lacks neutrality. More balanced language could include terms like "potential benefits," "significant opportunities," and "important step." The metaphor of "a withered flower of yesterday" is evocative but emotionally charged.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the benefits of a trilateral FTA between China, Japan, and South Korea, but omits potential drawbacks or dissenting viewpoints. There is no discussion of potential negative impacts on smaller economies or specific sectors within the three countries. While acknowledging space constraints is valid, the lack of counterarguments weakens the analysis.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a false dichotomy by framing the choice as either signing the FTA and boosting economic growth or facing the negative consequences of inaction, neglecting the complexity of international relations and potential alternative solutions. The portrayal of the US as solely pursuing unilateralism and protectionism oversimplifies a nuanced geopolitical landscape.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article emphasizes that a trilateral FTA among China, Japan, and South Korea will significantly boost economic development, create jobs, and enhance regional and global economic vitality. The agreement aims to improve trade in services, a key driver of economic growth, and leverage complementarities in sectors like digital healthcare and smart cities. The FTA is presented as a key strategy to counter protectionism and promote economic growth amidst global uncertainty.