french.china.org.cn
China Unveils National Security Strategy to Counter External Pressures
China's new national security white paper, released Monday, details a comprehensive strategy to counter perceived external threats, including increased diplomatic, economic, and technological resilience, while emphasizing the integration of development and security.
- How does China's emphasis on integrating development and security impact its foreign policy and relations with other countries?
- The white paper details China's response to perceived external threats, framing them as attempts at containment and destabilization. This response involves bolstering diplomatic, economic, and technological resilience, while emphasizing the importance of maintaining stability and progress in national security.
- What specific actions is China outlining in its new national security white paper to counter what it perceives as external threats?
- China's new national security white paper asserts the country will use integrated measures to counter external pressures, citing intensified threats and containment strategies from anti-China forces. The paper highlights interference in internal affairs, particularly concerning Taiwan, the South China Sea, and Xinjiang.
- What are the potential long-term implications of China's stated national security strategy for global stability and the international order?
- China's approach emphasizes a holistic national security strategy prioritizing the people's security and integrating development with security. This strategy suggests a long-term commitment to countering external pressures while maintaining economic growth and global influence, potentially leading to increased international tension.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing consistently portrays China as a victim of external pressures and aggression, emphasizing threats and challenges faced. Headlines and introductory statements highlight external threats, setting a defensive tone. This framing could influence readers to sympathize with China's perspective without critically examining its actions and policies.
Language Bias
The language used is highly charged and nationalistic. Terms like "anti-China forces," "endiguement," "répression," and "encerclement" create a sense of threat and victimhood. Neutral alternatives would include phrases like "countries critical of China's policies," "geopolitical challenges," and "international scrutiny." The repeated use of "forces" to describe opposition further emphasizes a sense of conflict.
Bias by Omission
The white paper focuses heavily on external threats to China's security, but omits internal factors that might contribute to instability or insecurity. There is no mention of potential internal dissent or social unrest, which could provide a more complete picture. The lack of discussion on human rights issues within China also limits the scope of the analysis. While brevity is understandable, these omissions could mislead readers into believing China faces only external challenges.
False Dichotomy
The white paper presents a stark dichotomy between China and external forces, framing the situation as a struggle against containment and repression. This oversimplifies the complex geopolitical landscape and ignores the nuances of China's relationships with other countries. The portrayal of other nations solely as hostile actors is a false dichotomy.
Sustainable Development Goals
The white paper highlights China's commitment to maintaining national security and stability, which is directly related to SDG 16 (Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions). China's efforts to counter external pressures and maintain stability contribute to a peaceful and secure environment, essential for sustainable development. The emphasis on a holistic approach to national security, including political security and the rule of law, also aligns with SDG 16.