China's 2022 Crackdown on Cross-Border Gambling: 73,000 Cases Investigated

China's 2022 Crackdown on Cross-Border Gambling: 73,000 Cases Investigated

europe.chinadaily.com.cn

China's 2022 Crackdown on Cross-Border Gambling: 73,000 Cases Investigated

Chinese authorities investigated 73,000 cross-border gambling cases in 2022, dismantling 4,500 online platforms, arresting 11,000 suspects, and repatriating over 3,700 individuals, reflecting a sustained crackdown involving extensive international cooperation.

English
China
International RelationsJusticeChinaOrganized CrimeLaw EnforcementInternational CooperationThailandPhilippinesMyanmarTelecom FraudCross-Border Gambling
Ministry Of Public SecurityPeople's Bank Of ChinaDc Gambling Group
Lin Jian
What were the key results of China's 2022 crackdown on cross-border gambling, and what immediate impact did it have on criminal networks?
In 2022, Chinese police investigated 73,000 cross-border gambling cases, dismantling over 4,500 online platforms and arresting 11,000 suspects. This crackdown included operations targeting major gambling groups operating overseas and involved international cooperation.
What long-term challenges remain in combating cross-border gambling, and what strategies are likely to be most effective in addressing them?
Future success hinges on sustained international cooperation and the ability to disrupt financial flows supporting these criminal networks. The focus on targeting payment institutions, investment schemes, and livestreaming platforms indicates a comprehensive approach to eliminating these operations.
How did the Chinese government's multi-agency approach and international partnerships contribute to the success of the anti-gambling campaign?
The Chinese government's intensified efforts against cross-border gambling reflect a broader strategy to combat transnational crime. The repatriation of over 3,700 suspects and collaboration with multiple domestic and international agencies highlight the scale and complexity of this initiative.

Cognitive Concepts

4/5

Framing Bias

The framing strongly favors the perspective of the Chinese authorities. The headline (if there were one) would likely emphasize the number of arrests and operations conducted. The language used, such as "battle", "crack down", and "destroy", paints a picture of a decisive and necessary fight against crime, while potentially downplaying or ignoring other aspects of the situation.

4/5

Language Bias

The language used is strongly suggestive of a law enforcement perspective. Words like "dismantling," "crack down," "destroy," "captured," and "suspects" present the activities in a negative light, portraying the individuals involved as criminals with little nuance. More neutral language could include phrasing such as "investigated," "intercepted," or "returned to China".

3/5

Bias by Omission

The article focuses heavily on the actions taken by Chinese authorities to combat cross-border gambling, but omits perspectives from individuals involved in the gambling operations or those affected by the crackdown. It doesn't include details on the effectiveness of these operations from an independent source, or the potential unintended consequences for those who might lose their livelihoods as a result of the crackdown. The human cost of these actions is largely absent.

3/5

False Dichotomy

The article presents a clear dichotomy: Chinese authorities are fighting against cross-border gambling, and those involved in it are criminals. It doesn't explore the complexities of the issue, such as the economic pressures that may lead people to participate in gambling, or the regulatory challenges in addressing cross-border activities.

Sustainable Development Goals

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions Positive
Direct Relevance

The Chinese government's crackdown on cross-border gambling and telecom fraud reflects a commitment to upholding the rule of law, combating transnational crime, and protecting its citizens from financial exploitation. The repatriation of suspects and international cooperation demonstrate a proactive approach to strengthening justice systems and fostering safer communities. This aligns with SDG 16, which aims to promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access to justice for all, and build effective, accountable, and inclusive institutions at all levels.