elmundo.es
China's 70th Anniversary of WWII Victory Parade: A Show of Power and a Reframing of History
China's massive military parade celebrating the 70th anniversary of WWII's end in the Pacific showcased its military might, positioned itself as a global leader, and subtly challenged the West's narrative of the war and post-war order.
- What was the primary message conveyed by China's military parade?
- The parade was a clear demonstration of China's military power, both conventional and advanced, signaling its growing strength to both domestic and international audiences. This aimed to bolster national pride internally and project deterrence globally.
- How did the parade position China within the global geopolitical landscape?
- The event contrasted China's self-proclaimed 'genuine multilateralism' against the West's perceived 'exclusive security clubs,' particularly NATO, which China accuses of Cold War mentalities. This served to position China as a stabilizing global force offering alternatives to Western-led alliances.
- What long-term implications can be drawn from China's framing of its role in WWII and the post-war order?
- By linking its current initiatives like BRICS and the Belt and Road Initiative to its role in the creation of the post-WWII order, China seeks to legitimize its global ambitions. This involves reframing historical narratives, claiming a leading role in shaping international norms and institutions, and challenging the dominance of Western narratives.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames China's military parade and political maneuvers as a strategic positioning, emphasizing its power and influence on the global stage. The description of the parade as 'a spectacle of precision, pomp, and ceremony' and the careful detailing of guest attendance (Putin and Kim Jong-un flanking Xi Jinping) contribute to this framing. The repeated emphasis on China's military might and its 'double message' (internal and external) further reinforces this perspective. However, counterarguments or alternative interpretations of China's actions are largely absent, limiting a balanced understanding.
Language Bias
The language used is often loaded and descriptive, favoring a portrayal of China's actions as powerful and strategic. Terms like 'stunning military strength,' 'clear warning,' and 'overwhelming military force' present a positive view of China's capabilities and intentions. The description of the West as promoting 'exclusive security clubs' carries a negative connotation. More neutral language could include phrases like 'significant military capabilities,' 'strong message,' and 'international security organizations.'
Bias by Omission
The article omits perspectives critical of China's actions and policies. While it acknowledges the West's concerns about China's growing influence, it doesn't fully explore the counterarguments or offer alternative explanations for China's motivations. The lack of diverse voices and opinions, besides those implicitly supporting China's narrative, leads to an incomplete picture.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a false dichotomy between China's 'genuine multilateralism' and the West's 'exclusive clubs.' This simplification ignores the nuances of international relations and the complexities of China's engagement with global institutions. It also portrays a simplistic choice between China's proposed order and the existing one, neglecting the possibility of alternative approaches or collaborations.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article discusses China's commemoration of the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II in the Pacific, using it to promote its vision of a multilateral world order and challenge the West's dominance. This directly relates to SDG 16 (Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions) by focusing on global governance, international cooperation, and the promotion of a more inclusive and just international system. China's actions aim to reshape global norms and institutions, impacting the global landscape of peace and justice.