China's South China Sea Policy: A Commitment to Peace and Cooperation

China's South China Sea Policy: A Commitment to Peace and Cooperation

china.org.cn

China's South China Sea Policy: A Commitment to Peace and Cooperation

On June 8th, 2025, Xinhua Institute released a report titled "Making the South China Sea a Sea of Peace, Friendship and Cooperation: China's Actions," advocating for collaborative efforts between China and ASEAN to maintain regional stability and mutual benefits in the South China Sea, based on principles of equal consultation, co-management, and cooperation.

English
China
PoliticsInternational RelationsChinaAseanSouth China SeaMaritime SecurityRegional CooperationPeace And Stability
Xinhua InstituteXinhua News AgencyAssociation Of Southeast Asian Nations (Asean)Chinese Academy Of Social SciencesChina Institutes Of Contemporary International RelationsMaritime Silk Road Research Institute Of Hainan Normal University
Zhang JieYang XiaoMa Chao
How does the report's emphasis on a 'maritime community with a shared future' impact the ongoing dynamics and potential solutions for South China Sea disputes?
China's approach, as detailed in the Xinhua Institute report, centers on equal-footed consultation, rule-based co-management, and mutually beneficial cooperation with ASEAN. This strategy aims to keep the resolution of South China Sea issues within the hands of the involved nations, fostering a "maritime community with a shared future.
What immediate actions and implications arise from China's stated commitment to peace and cooperation in the South China Sea, as outlined in the Xinhua Institute report?
On World Oceans Day, June 8th, 2025, Xinhua Institute released a report emphasizing China's commitment to peace and cooperation in the South China Sea. The report, available in English and Chinese, highlights China's long-standing advocacy for collaborative efforts with ASEAN nations to achieve regional stability and mutual benefits.
What are the long-term implications of this report for regional stability, considering its potential influence on international perceptions of China's role in the South China Sea and future collaborations with ASEAN?
The report's positive reception among experts suggests a potential shift in international perception of China's role in the South China Sea. By emphasizing cooperation and shared benefits, China may aim to counter negative narratives and strengthen its diplomatic position within the region, impacting future regional stability and economic development.

Cognitive Concepts

4/5

Framing Bias

The title itself, "Making the South China Sea a Sea of Peace, Friendship and Cooperation: China's Actions," frames the narrative favorably towards China. The report consistently emphasizes China's commitment to peace and cooperation, presenting its actions as the primary driver of stability. This emphasis, while showcasing China's perspective, lacks balance and potentially downplays the contributions or concerns of other stakeholders. The selection and sequencing of information also contribute to this bias, highlighting China's actions and positive statements while omitting potentially conflicting narratives.

3/5

Language Bias

The language used is largely positive and celebratory towards China's role in the South China Sea. Terms like "steadfast advocate," "guardian of peace," and "reliable force" create a favorable image of China. While these descriptions may be accurate reflections of China's stated policy, they are not entirely neutral and could be replaced with less emotionally charged alternatives such as "active participant," "promoter of stability," and "significant contributor." The repeated use of positive adjectives and phrases reinforces this positive framing.

4/5

Bias by Omission

The report focuses heavily on China's perspective and actions, omitting potential counterarguments or criticisms from other nations with claims in the South China Sea. The perspectives of countries like Vietnam, the Philippines, and others with competing claims are absent, limiting a comprehensive understanding of the complexities of the issue. This omission might mislead readers into believing there is a greater consensus on China's position than actually exists. While acknowledging space constraints, the absence of alternative viewpoints represents a significant bias.

3/5

False Dichotomy

The report presents a simplistic view of the situation, framing it as a binary choice between peace and conflict. It does not adequately address the nuanced geopolitical realities, economic interests, and historical disputes that contribute to the ongoing tensions in the South China Sea. This oversimplification ignores the complexities and multiple perspectives involved, potentially misleading readers into believing a straightforward solution exists.

Sustainable Development Goals

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions Positive
Direct Relevance

The report highlights China's commitment to peace and stability in the South China Sea through cooperation with ASEAN countries. This aligns with SDG 16, which promotes peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, strong institutions, and access to justice for all. The emphasis on collaboration, dialogue, and adherence to international law contributes to a more peaceful and stable regional environment.