telegraph.co.uk
Church Abuse Cover-up Allegations
A review reveals failures to act on allegations of abuse against John Smyth, leading to calls for the resignation of several church officials.
English
United Kingdom
UkInvestigationAccountabilityAbuseChurchCover-Up
Diocese Of ElySt Leonard’s ChurchOakleyChurch Of England
Bishop WellsBishop ConwayJohn SmythRev Sue ColmanSir Jamie ColmanArchbishop Of Canterbury
- How did Bishop Wells respond to the criticism in the review?
- Bishop Wells expressed regret for not doing more to verify assurances and query assumptions regarding the handling of the abuse allegations. She stated that she believed the matter was being appropriately addressed by a police investigation.
- What is the main criticism against Rev Sue Colman and her husband?
- Rev Sue Colman and her husband continued to financially support John Smyth despite likely knowing about his abuse in the UK and Africa. The victim calls for her resignation, highlighting her long-standing involvement and failure to act.
- What is the victim's main argument regarding the responsibility for the abuse?
- The victim in the report calls for the resignation of several individuals involved, emphasizing the widespread implication of multiple church members, and not just the Archbishop of Canterbury.
- What actions did Bishop Wells take after reporting the abuse allegations in 2013?
- Bishop Wells failed to take further action after reporting abuse allegations in 2013, relying on the police for further advice which never came. The review criticized her inaction and lack of follow-up.
- What does the report suggest about the handling of abuse allegations within the Church?
- The report highlights a systemic failure to adequately address the abuse allegations, with multiple individuals facing criticism for their inaction and continued support of the abuser despite knowledge of his crimes.