repubblica.it
Church's Resistance to Modernity: Historical Examples and Current Challenges
This article analyzes the Roman Catholic Church's historical resistance to scientific advancements and political changes, exemplified by the Galileo affair and the loss of Papal States, highlighting its current struggle to adapt to modern issues surrounding life and death.
- What were the historical consequences of the Church's resistance to scientific and political change?
- The Church's opposition to Galileo's heliocentric theory delayed scientific progress, while its resistance to Italian unification resulted in the loss of the Papal States and nearly half a century of non-collaboration with the new Italian state. These actions demonstrate the consequences of prioritizing dogma over scientific evidence and political realities.
- What are the contemporary challenges facing the Church, and how does its current approach compare to its past responses?
- The Church now confronts complex issues surrounding life and death, including euthanasia and birth control. Its response mirrors past reactions: a rigid stance driven by concerns about losing authority, indicating a continued struggle to balance religious doctrine with the realities of modern life and scientific advancements. This may lead to future conflicts and a further erosion of its influence.
- How did the Church's approach to the Galileo affair and the Italian unification differ, and what were the underlying principles?
- In the Galileo affair, the Church relied on the authority of scripture to counter scientific findings, while in the case of Italian unification, it defended its temporal power, despite the lack of scriptural basis. Both actions stemmed from a rigid adherence to established doctrines and a resistance to change, ultimately resulting in significant losses for the Church.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The text presents a critical analysis of the Catholic Church's historical responses to scientific advancements and political changes, framing the Church's actions as stemming from a lack of 'sense of limits'. This framing is evident from the outset, with the author questioning the Church's wisdom and highlighting instances where the Church's actions led to demonstrable negative consequences. The examples of Galileo's trial and the loss of Papal States are presented as clear evidence of this lack of limits, setting the stage for the author's argument. The concluding paragraph reinforces this framing by comparing contemporary challenges faced by the Church to its past failures.
Language Bias
While the author uses some strong language ("delirio," "intransigentismo papale"), the overall tone is analytical rather than overtly inflammatory. However, terms like "miserabile cosa" and descriptions of the Church's actions as "innegabile rilevanza" (undeniable relevance) show a clear bias. The author's subjective judgments are clearly present, and while examples are given, no neutral alternatives are offered.
Bias by Omission
The analysis focuses heavily on the Church's perceived failures, omitting counterarguments or perspectives that might support the Church's actions. For instance, the complex socio-political circumstances surrounding Galileo's trial and the loss of the Papal States receive limited attention. While acknowledging the Church's infallibility is debatable, the text doesn't explore theological justifications for the Church's stances. The omission of these perspectives limits the reader's ability to reach a fully informed conclusion.
False Dichotomy
The author presents a false dichotomy by portraying the Church's actions as consistently driven by an absence of limits and contrasting it with a supposed ideal of balance between the divine and the human. This oversimplifies the Church's multifaceted history and motivations, neglecting the various internal debates and evolving perspectives within the Church. The text does not delve into instances where the Church has shown flexibility or adapted its views.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article discusses the historical conflict between the Catholic Church and advancements in science and politics. The examples of Galileo