Climate Change Poses Systemic Risk to Global Financial Markets

Climate Change Poses Systemic Risk to Global Financial Markets

theglobeandmail.com

Climate Change Poses Systemic Risk to Global Financial Markets

A confluence of factors, including rising extreme weather events and the potential for climate litigation, is creating a systemic risk to global financial markets, with implications for asset values and future stability.

English
Canada
EconomyClimate ChangeCanadaReal EstateInsuranceFinancial MarketsClimate LitigationClimate Risk
Bank For International Settlements (Bis)The Globe And MailUniversity Of Pennsylvania's Wharton SchoolEcojusticeInternational Court Of Justice (Icj)
John RapleyNassim Nicholas TalebBenjamin KeysFraser Thomson
What is the core financial risk posed by climate change, and what are its immediate implications?
Climate change's core financial risk stems from extreme weather events causing asset devaluation, potentially triggering a chain reaction similar to the 2008 crisis. Insurance and reinsurance markets already show significant cost inflation (25 percent since 2018 in the U.S.), indicating early stress in climate-exposed sectors.
How does climate change differ from previous economic crises, and what are the broader implications?
Unlike cyclical bubbles that correct themselves, climate change's impact is structural and self-reinforcing. Asset devaluation from climate change will worsen unless mitigated, unlike previous crises caused by temporary excesses. This creates a fundamentally different and potentially more severe risk.
What are the future implications of climate litigation and its potential effect on investment strategies?
The International Court of Justice's ruling on national liability for carbon emissions opens the door for widespread climate litigation against fossil fuel companies within the next decade. This impending legal risk, coupled with the potential for increased claims from homeowners and governments, poses a significant threat to asset values requiring proactive investor adaptation.

Cognitive Concepts

1/5

Framing Bias

The article presents a balanced view by presenting expert opinions from various fields, such as finance, climate science, and law. While it highlights the potential risks of climate change on financial markets, it also acknowledges countervailing factors and complexities. The use of expert opinions and data adds to the objectivity of the article.

1/5

Language Bias

The language used is largely neutral and objective. While terms like "catastrophic" and "huge" are used, they are employed to describe events based on expert analysis and data, rather than expressing an opinion. The author uses quotes from experts to support their claims.

2/5

Bias by Omission

The article could benefit from including perspectives from the fossil fuel industry or from those who dispute the severity of climate change's financial impact. However, given the article's focus on the potential risks, and the strength of the evidence presented, the omissions do not significantly skew the overall message. Further, the inclusion of additional perspectives would likely detract from the article's length and impact.

Sustainable Development Goals

Climate Action Negative
Direct Relevance

The article directly addresses the impacts of climate change on financial markets and the potential for climate-related shocks to trigger a global financial crisis. It highlights the increasing intensity of extreme weather events, rising insurance costs, and the potential for significant asset devaluation due to climate change. The discussion of climate litigation further underscores the financial risks associated with inaction on climate change.