College Counseling Tech Platforms Increase Access and Affordability

College Counseling Tech Platforms Increase Access and Affordability

forbes.com

College Counseling Tech Platforms Increase Access and Affordability

Technology platforms like CounselMore and College Sharks are transforming college admissions preparation by addressing the shortage of high school counselors and the high cost of private consultants, offering structured workflows and affordable, accessible guidance.

English
United States
EconomyTechnologyEdtechEducational InequalityCollege AdmissionsAccess To EducationCollege CounselingTechnology Platforms
American School Counselor AssociationCounselmoreCollege SharksAnnapolis College ConsultingIndependent Educational Consulting AssociationU.s. News Best CollegesIntegrated Postsecondary Education Data System
Margaret RotheLee Norwood
How do CounselMore and College Sharks differ in their approach to providing college admissions guidance?
The rising demand for college counseling services, coupled with limited resources in public schools, has created a gap in access. Platforms like CounselMore and College Sharks leverage technology to bridge this gap, providing structured workflows for counselors and affordable, accessible guidance for students. This addresses the disparity in access to quality college counseling based on socioeconomic status.
What are the potential long-term consequences of using technology to improve access to college counseling?
These technological advancements will likely increase accessibility and affordability of college admissions guidance. CounselMore's data-driven approach and College Sharks' user-friendly format could lead to better-informed college decisions for students, regardless of their background. Future developments might include personalized learning pathways and predictive analytics within these platforms.
What is the primary impact of technology platforms like CounselMore and College Sharks on the college admissions process?
The college admissions landscape is changing due to technology platforms like CounselMore and College Sharks, which address the shortage of high school counselors and the high cost of private consultants. CounselMore helps counselors manage their workload efficiently, while College Sharks offers affordable, direct-to-student college admissions guidance.

Cognitive Concepts

3/5

Framing Bias

The article frames the rise of college counseling technology platforms very positively, highlighting their benefits in addressing access and guidance gaps. The headline and introduction set a generally optimistic tone, focusing on the 'quiet transformation' and 'rewriting the playbook.' While acknowledging the challenges of traditional counseling, the framing heavily emphasizes the advantages of technological solutions.

2/5

Language Bias

The language used is generally positive and promotional towards the tech platforms. Words like "quiet transformation," "rewriting the playbook," and "innovation" create a favorable impression. While descriptive, the article could benefit from using more neutral language in certain sections, for instance, replacing "engaging on-demand course" with something like "structured online course" to reduce promotional language.

3/5

Bias by Omission

The article focuses heavily on two specific platforms, CounselMore and College Sharks, potentially omitting other technological solutions or approaches to improving college admissions counseling. While acknowledging the limitations of high school counselors, it doesn't explore alternative solutions like increased government funding or changes in school structure to alleviate the counselor shortage. This omission might limit the reader's understanding of the broader landscape of solutions to this problem.

2/5

False Dichotomy

The article presents a somewhat false dichotomy between traditional counseling and tech-based solutions. While it acknowledges the limitations of the former, it doesn't fully explore the potential downsides or limitations of the tech solutions, such as digital divides, equity issues related to access to technology and potential biases embedded within algorithms (although the article does state that the focus is on human-centered design rather than AI).

Sustainable Development Goals

Quality Education Positive
Direct Relevance

The article discusses technology platforms that aim to improve access to college admissions guidance, addressing the shortage of school counselors and the high cost of private consultants. This directly supports SDG 4 (Quality Education), specifically target 4.5 which aims to 'Eliminate gender disparities in education and ensure equal access to all levels of education for vulnerable groups'. By providing more affordable and accessible college counseling resources, these platforms help to level the playing field for students from diverse socioeconomic backgrounds, improving their chances of accessing higher education.