elpais.com
Colombian Right Consolidates Around Dávila's 2026 Presidential Bid
Former Uribe advisor Alicia Arango joined Vicky Dávila's 2026 presidential campaign, signaling a right-wing strategy emulating leaders like Milei, Bukele, and Trump, amidst Uribe's trial and Petro's proactive governance.
- How does Uribe's trial impact the right's strategy for the 2026 election?
- Dávila initially emulated Milei's style but shifted after cryptocurrency scandals, incorporating Arango and Duque's supporters. This realignment occurs as Uribe faces trial, highlighting the right's struggle to find a viable candidate amidst internal divisions and Petro's proactive governance.
- What is the significance of Alicia Arango joining Vicky Dávila's presidential campaign?
- The Colombian right wing is consolidating around Vicky Dávila's 2026 presidential bid, with the addition of Alicia Arango as campaign manager. Arango's political experience, including roles under Uribe and Duque, signals a strategy mirroring right-wing leaders like Milei, Bukele, and Trump.
- What are the long-term implications of the Colombian right's current internal divisions and strategic shifts?
- The right's reactive approach contrasts with Petro's active agenda-setting, including a proposed popular consultation on social reforms. While polls show right-wing options, they lack a strong candidate, indicating a potential continued Petro influence in 2026.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The narrative focuses intensely on the strategic moves of the right-wing, particularly Uribe and Dávila's campaign, describing their actions and alliances in detail. The headline (if there were one) would likely emphasize the right-wing's attempts to consolidate power. This emphasis shapes the reader's perception by creating a narrative of a resurgent right-wing rather than a more balanced presentation of competing political forces. The sequencing places heavy emphasis on the right's strategies and struggles, even while acknowledging the left's attempts, giving the impression of a more formidable opposition.
Language Bias
The article uses strong, descriptive language to portray the right-wing's actions and motivations ("tierra de motosierras, megacárceles y aranceles," "extrema derecha," "viejo chalán y domador de caballos"). While vivid, this language carries a negative connotation and could influence the reader's perception. Neutral alternatives could be used, for example, replacing "extrema derecha" with "far-right" or using more neutral descriptors for Uribe's political style. The term "hectoring" instead of "chalán" might offer a suitable alternative.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the political maneuvering of the right-wing in Colombia, particularly around Vicky Dávila's campaign. While it mentions President Petro's initiatives, it lacks detailed analysis of his policy proposals or public support beyond stating he "has maintained the initiative" and "imposed the agenda." The omission of substantial information on Petro's platform and public perception limits the reader's ability to fully compare and contrast the candidates and their platforms. This is potentially significant as it skews the analysis towards the right-wing's strategic moves without providing an equally thorough examination of the opposing side.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplified view of the Colombian political landscape, largely framing it as a battle between the left (represented by Petro) and the right (represented by Dávila and the Uribe faction). While acknowledging some center-leaning individuals and groups, it doesn't fully explore the complexities or potential alliances beyond the main players. This simplifies a potentially multi-faceted political dynamic and could unintentionally mislead the reader into believing a more binary division than actually exists.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights the alignment of the radical right around a candidate who mirrors the policies of leaders like Milei, Bukele, and Trump, known for policies that tend to exacerbate inequality. The focus on these leaders and their policies suggests a potential negative impact on efforts to reduce inequality in Colombia. The lack of concrete policy proposals from Davila beyond opposition to Petro also points to a lack of focus on addressing inequality.