forbes.com
Combating Anxiety Amidst Global Uncertainty: Three Evidence-Based Exercises
Global uncertainty fueled by economic instability and political tensions is causing widespread anxiety and depression, prompting suggestions for three evidence-based exercises to improve mental well-being: acts of kindness, a three-good-things journal, and mindfulness.
- What are the immediate psychological consequences of global economic and political instability, and how do these compare to previous periods of uncertainty?
- Recent global uncertainty, stemming from economic instability and political tensions, has led to increased anxiety and depression, mirroring the 25% surge seen during the COVID-19 pandemic. Studies show that acts of kindness significantly improve mood and life satisfaction.
- How do the suggested exercises—acts of kindness, three-good-things journaling, and mindfulness—impact mood, stress levels, and overall well-being, according to the provided research?
- The article links increased anxiety and depression to global uncertainty caused by economic instability and political tensions, citing a 25% surge during COVID-19 as a parallel. It then proposes three evidence-based strategies to improve mental well-being.
- What are the long-term implications of consistently practicing these mental well-being techniques during periods of prolonged global uncertainty, and how might they affect individuals' resilience and coping mechanisms?
- The suggested exercises—acts of kindness, a three-good-things journal, and mindfulness—offer practical tools to manage stress and improve outlook during times of global uncertainty. These techniques empower individuals to regain control over their emotional well-being amidst external chaos.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the current global situation as a source of anxiety and depression, which is accurate. However, it quickly shifts the focus to individual coping mechanisms, potentially downplaying the significance of the larger political and economic issues. The introduction sets the stage by describing global uncertainty, but the overall emphasis is on personal responsibility for managing mood rather than addressing the systemic causes of widespread anxiety.
Language Bias
The language used is generally neutral and informative. However, phrases such as "erratic yo-yo pattern" to describe the stock market could be perceived as slightly sensationalized. The repeated mention of "depression" and "anxiety" might contribute to a slightly negative overall tone. More neutral phrasing could be employed, such as 'volatility' instead of 'erratic yo-yo pattern'.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses on individual coping mechanisms for anxiety and depression stemming from current global uncertainty, but omits discussion of broader societal and political factors contributing to these feelings. While acknowledging global uncertainty, it doesn't delve into potential systemic solutions or policy changes that could address the root causes of anxiety and depression. This omission may leave readers feeling disempowered and focused solely on individual responsibility.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat false dichotomy by implying that individual actions like acts of kindness, journaling, and mindfulness are the primary solutions to widespread anxiety and depression resulting from complex global events. While these are helpful coping mechanisms, they don't address the underlying systemic issues contributing to the problem.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article discusses methods to improve mental health and well-being, such as acts of kindness, gratitude journaling, and mindfulness, which directly contribute to SDG 3 (Good Health and Well-being) by promoting mental health and well-being. The exercises suggested aim to reduce stress, anxiety, and depression, which are significant global health challenges.