elpais.com
Combating Climate Change Misinformation: A 2025 Perspective
Isabel Moreno's new book, 'Atmosphere of Rumors,' combats climate change misinformation prevalent on social media, arguing that the irreversible nature of current changes necessitates urgent action to mitigate future consequences.
- What are the primary dangers of climate change misinformation spread through social media, and how does it impede effective responses?
- The book 'Atmosphere of Rumors' tackles climate change misinformation spread through social media, hindering effective action. Combating these false narratives requires more than short videos; detailed explanations are needed to counter misleading claims like CO2's minimal atmospheric percentage. This misinformation undermines public trust in science and delays crucial climate action.
- How does the book 'Atmosphere of Rumors' address specific climate change myths, and what are some of the most prevalent and harmful examples?
- Social media's rapid dissemination of climate change misinformation poses a significant economic risk, as highlighted by the World Economic Forum. Misconceptions about heatwaves—attributing them to normal weather patterns—illustrate how misinformation prevents proactive protective measures, impacting individual health and broader societal well-being.
- What long-term systemic consequences will result from continued climate change misinformation, and what strategies can effectively counter its spread and impact?
- The irreversible nature of climate change is crucial to understand. Even with immediate action, cascading effects will continue, emphasizing the urgency to curb the current trajectory. Continued presence in the public sphere, particularly on social media, is vital to counter the prevalence of misinformation and inform decision-making.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing is predominantly focused on the negative impacts of misinformation, emphasizing the urgency of addressing climate change denial. This framing might unintentionally downplay the positive actions being taken by individuals and organizations, potentially creating a sense of hopelessness or inaction. However, the inclusion of a meteorologist's perspective adds credibility and balances the narrative somewhat.
Language Bias
The language used is generally neutral and informative, though terms like "bulos" (hoaxes) and "desastre" (disaster) carry a degree of emotional weight. However, this aligns with the seriousness of the topic and the urgency of the message. The use of analogies and relatable examples makes the information accessible and avoids overly technical jargon.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses on the spread of misinformation regarding climate change and its impact on decision-making. While it mentions the importance of scientific evidence, it doesn't delve into specific examples of impactful climate change events or the detailed scientific data supporting the claims made. This omission could leave the reader with a less complete picture of the urgency and severity of the climate crisis.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights the negative impact of climate change misinformation on efforts to mitigate climate change. The spread of misinformation through social media undermines public trust in science, hinders effective policymaking, and delays individual actions necessary to curb climate change. The article emphasizes the urgency of addressing climate change and the irreversible nature of some of the changes already underway.