nrc.nl
Combating Disinformation in US Elections
Analysis of the spread of disinformation during the US elections, highlighting the roles of social media, legal battles, and financial consequences.
Dutch
Netherlands
PoliticsUs PoliticsElectionsEuropean UnionSocial MediaMisinformationLaw
YoutubeGoogleMedia MattersStanford Internet ObservatoryFox News
Rudy GiulianiDonald TrumpJoe BidenElon MuskMark Zuckerberg
- What are the potential consequences of spreading disinformation?
- Fox News's $787.5 million settlement with Dominion Voting Systems for spreading false information about the 2020 election serves as a cautionary example, highlighting potential legal consequences.
- What are the main challenges in combating disinformation during the US elections?
- The article discusses the challenges of combating disinformation surrounding the US elections, highlighting the reduced efforts of social media platforms and government agencies compared to 2020.
- What is the role of political and legal challenges in the spread of disinformation?
- The Republican Party's legal challenges against social media moderation and government efforts to combat disinformation have restricted oversight and increased the spread of misinformation.
- How have social media platforms changed their approach to election misinformation since 2020?
- YouTube's decision to stop actively removing election misinformation, coupled with the rise of false narratives on platforms like X (formerly Twitter), has created a more permissive environment for the spread of disinformation.
- What evidence is there to support the claim of widespread disinformation on platforms like YouTube?
- Organizations like Media Matters have documented the significant volume of false information about the 2020, 2022, and 2024 elections spread on YouTube, generating revenue through ad placements.