taz.de
Contemporary Cinema's Narcissism: A Reflection of Societal Trends
Lars Henrik Gass's essay, "Objektverlust," analyzes how contemporary cinema, particularly films popular with Western middle classes, reflects a societal narcissism stemming from digitalization and labor deregulation, losing engagement with external reality, unlike the socially critical Italian Neorealism.
- How does contemporary cinema, as analyzed by Gass, reflect and reinforce societal narcissism, particularly among Western middle classes?
- Lars Henrik Gass's essay, "Objektverlust. Film in der narzisstischen Gesellschaft," argues that contemporary cinema reflects societal narcissism, particularly impacting Western middle classes whose leisure activities have changed due to digitalization and labor deregulation. This shift is characterized by a self-referential focus, mirroring societal trends rather than offering external critiques.
- What are the key differences between Gass's perspective on the role of cinema and Kracauer's earlier understanding of its potential for social critique?
- Gass contrasts this contemporary cinema with Siegfried Kracauer's view of film's potential to overcome false consciousness. He contends that modern films, exemplified by "Barbie," prioritize self-representation within a consumerist framework, losing engagement with external reality. This "object loss" indicates a detachment from broader societal issues.
- What are the potential long-term consequences of the "object loss" identified by Gass, and what steps could counteract this trend in contemporary filmmaking?
- Gass's analysis suggests a future where cinema's societal impact diminishes as it becomes increasingly self-absorbed. This trend, if unchecked, could lead to a decline in cinema's capacity for social critique and contribute to a further fragmentation of cultural understanding. The use of a 25-year-old film as a key example, however, weakens this otherwise insightful critique.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing heavily emphasizes the author's thesis of a 'narcissistic' contemporary cinema, presenting examples that support this view while downplaying or omitting those that might contradict it. The title itself, "Objektverlust. Film in der narzisstischen Gesellschaft," sets a strong frame that predisposes the reader to accept the author's argument. The selection of films discussed reinforces this bias.
Language Bias
While the language is generally academic and precise, the repeated use of "narcissistic" to describe both society and cinema could be considered loaded language. The author uses strong evaluative terms like "instagrammable narcissism" which may reflect a pre-conceived judgment rather than objective analysis. More neutral terms like "self-absorbed" or "self-referential" might be used in some instances to avoid potential bias.
Bias by Omission
The analysis focuses heavily on the author's perspective of narcissism in contemporary cinema, potentially omitting counterarguments or diverse viewpoints on the subject. While it mentions Italian Neorealism as a contrasting example, a more in-depth exploration of films that defy the author's characterization of narcissistic cinema would strengthen the analysis. The limited scope might unintentionally exclude films that challenge the presented thesis.
False Dichotomy
The essay presents a dichotomy between a past cinema focused on external reality and a present cinema consumed by self-reflection and narcissism. This oversimplifies the complexity of cinematic history and contemporary film production, ignoring films that blend both approaches or offer alternative perspectives on society.
Gender Bias
The analysis doesn't explicitly focus on gender bias. However, the selection of films and filmmakers mentioned may unintentionally reflect existing gender imbalances within the film industry. A more thorough examination of gender representation in the films discussed would provide a more comprehensive analysis.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article discusses how contemporary cinema reflects a narcissistic societal development, primarily affecting Western middle classes. This trend, fueled by internet culture and changing leisure patterns, contributes to inequality by focusing on the self-absorbed perspectives of a specific demographic, neglecting broader societal issues and potentially marginalizing other groups. The film industry's focus on the tastes and preferences of a specific affluent group exacerbates existing inequalities.