Coronial Inquest into Death of Child with Undiagnosed Leukemia

Coronial Inquest into Death of Child with Undiagnosed Leukemia

smh.com.au

Coronial Inquest into Death of Child with Undiagnosed Leukemia

A coronial inquest into the death of 21-month-old Sandipan Dhar from undiagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia is investigating whether blood tests could have prevented his death at Joondalup Health Campus on March 24, 2024, after multiple visits to medical facilities.

English
Australia
JusticeHealthHealthcareChild DeathMedical NegligenceLeukemiaCoronial Inquest
Ramsay Health CareJoondalup Health CampusKey Largo Medical CentreAustralian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency
Sandipan DharSanjoy DharSaraswati DharDr Chinniah PrabhakarDr Sanjeev RanaDr Caolan O'hearrainDr Yii SiowJagadish Krishnan
Did the lack of blood testing at either Key Largo Medical Centre or Joondalup Health Campus directly contribute to Sandipan Dhar's death?
21-month-old Sandipan Dhar died from undiagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia at Joondalup Health Campus on March 24, 2024. A coronial inquest is investigating whether earlier blood tests could have saved his life, focusing on a potential missed opportunity on March 22nd. The inquest will examine actions taken by both GPs at Key Largo Medical Centre and hospital staff.
What specific communication breakdowns or procedural issues occurred during Sandipan's treatment at both medical facilities that might have prevented earlier diagnosis?
The inquest into Sandipan Dhar's death examines the sequence of events leading up to his death, including his visits to Key Largo Medical Centre and Joondalup Health Campus. The investigation centers on whether timely blood testing was requested or performed and the decision-making process around admission and testing at each healthcare facility. Conflicting accounts exist concerning requests for blood tests and the reasons for the boy's discharge from the hospital.
What systemic changes are necessary within Australian healthcare facilities to prevent similar situations arising in the future and improve early detection and treatment of acute leukemia in children?
This case highlights the critical need for improved communication and clarity in medical decision-making, particularly concerning potentially life-threatening conditions in children. The inquest's findings could influence future protocols for evaluating children with persistent fevers and similar symptoms, potentially impacting the diagnostic process and treatment pathways for acute leukemia. The lack of documentation and conflicting accounts underscore the importance of clear, comprehensive medical record-keeping.

Cognitive Concepts

3/5

Framing Bias

The article frames the narrative around the question of whether blood tests were missed, implying potential negligence. This emphasis is evident in the headline and opening sentences. While presenting details of the medical professionals' actions, the overall framing suggests a focus on individual accountability within the medical system, rather than a broader examination of systemic issues or resource constraints that might have impacted the timeline of diagnosis.

2/5

Language Bias

While largely neutral, the repeated emphasis on the family's 'request' for blood tests, juxtaposed with the staff's lack of recollection, subtly frames the hospital staff in a negative light. Phrases like 'missed opportunity' and 'conflicting reports' also carry negative connotations, potentially influencing reader perception.

3/5

Bias by Omission

The article focuses heavily on the hospital and medical professionals' actions, potentially omitting exploration of broader systemic issues contributing to undiagnosed childhood leukemia or access to timely healthcare. The article mentions a review commissioned by Ramsay that cleared hospital staff but doesn't delve into the details or methodology of that review, which limits the reader's ability to evaluate its objectivity. The article also doesn't fully explore the reasons why the family chose to leave the hospital the first time, presenting conflicting accounts without providing a clear resolution.

3/5

False Dichotomy

The narrative presents a false dichotomy by focusing primarily on whether a blood test would have changed Sandipan's outcome, potentially overlooking other contributing factors like the rarity of the disease, the subtlety of early symptoms, and the potential limitations of early detection methods for this type of leukemia. It frames the inquest as primarily centered around individual culpability rather than a broader investigation into systemic issues within the healthcare system.

1/5

Gender Bias

The article reports on the father's emotional response ('Sandipan's father Sanjoy teared up') while mentioning the mother primarily in relation to her actions in bringing Sandipan to the hospital. The parents are both named and quoted, but the emotional framing seems somewhat disproportionate towards the father.

Sustainable Development Goals

Good Health and Well-being Negative
Direct Relevance

The death of a 21-month-old child due to undiagnosed leukemia highlights failures in the healthcare system to provide timely and accurate diagnosis and treatment. This directly impacts SDG 3, which aims to ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages. The inquest focuses on whether missed opportunities for blood tests contributed to the child's death, indicating shortcomings in healthcare access and quality.