Costa Rica's May Beetles Face Extinction Due to Urbanization"

Costa Rica's May Beetles Face Extinction Due to Urbanization"

elpais.com

Costa Rica's May Beetles Face Extinction Due to Urbanization"

The population of May beetles (Phyllophaga) in Costa Rica is declining drastically, primarily due to urbanization, impacting biodiversity and agriculture; experts estimate a 95% loss in 40 years.

Spanish
Spain
OtherClimate ChangeBiodiversity LossCosta RicaUrbanizationMay BeetlesHabitat Destruction
Universidad De Costa Rica (Ucr)Banco MundialFao
Andrés AriasRicardo Murillo
How do factors like pesticide use and climate change contribute to the decline of May beetles, and how do these factors interact with habitat loss?
The decline of May beetles in Costa Rica is primarily attributed to rapid urbanization, converting green spaces into concrete structures, disrupting their lifecycle and food sources. This loss of habitat is compounded by excessive pesticide use and changing rainfall patterns, though urbanization is considered the leading cause.
What is the primary cause of the drastic decline in the May beetle population in Costa Rica, and what are its immediate implications for the ecosystem?
In Costa Rica, the May beetle population, crucial to the ecosystem, is experiencing a drastic decline, potentially losing 95% of its species in 40 years due to urbanization and habitat loss, impacting biodiversity and agricultural practices.
What long-term consequences could the disappearance of May beetles have on Costa Rican biodiversity and agriculture, and what actions can be taken to mitigate these effects?
The decreasing May beetle population highlights the urgent need for sustainable urban planning in Costa Rica. Future research should focus on identifying affected species and regions, informing conservation strategies and promoting awareness of the beetles' ecological importance beyond agricultural concerns.

Cognitive Concepts

2/5

Framing Bias

The article frames the decline of May beetles as a significant environmental issue, emphasizing the loss of a cultural reference point and the potential for future generations to be unaware of the insect. This framing elicits empathy and concern, effectively raising awareness of the problem. The use of personal anecdotes from the biologists adds to the emotional impact of the story, furthering this framing. However, the repeated emphasis on the negative consequences of the decline might overshadow the potential positive impacts of conservation efforts or alternative solutions.

1/5

Language Bias

The language used is largely neutral. However, phrases like "torpemente" (clumsily) and descriptions of the beetles as "confused" by artificial light could be interpreted as anthropomorphic and slightly biased. While the article eventually refutes the idea that beetles are clumsy, the initial descriptions may shape the reader's initial perception. Suggesting more neutral descriptions such as "their nocturnal flight pattern is affected by artificial light" would improve neutrality.

3/5

Bias by Omission

The article focuses primarily on the decline of May beetles in urban areas, potentially omitting the impact on rural areas beyond mentioning that the habitat loss there is not as drastic. The article also doesn't delve into specific government policies or initiatives aimed at preserving these beetles or their habitats. While acknowledging other potential factors like pesticides and climate change, the article doesn't provide detailed analysis of their relative impact compared to urbanization. The lack of specific data on population decline beyond estimations also represents a potential omission.

2/5

False Dichotomy

The article presents a somewhat simplistic view of the conflict between urbanization and the survival of May beetles, not fully exploring potential solutions or balances that might allow for both development and conservation. It frames the issue primarily as an eitheor situation, overlooking the complexities of sustainable urban planning and agricultural practices.

Sustainable Development Goals

Life on Land Negative
Direct Relevance

The article highlights a significant decline in the population of May beetles (abejones de mayo) in Costa Rica, primarily due to habitat loss from urbanization. This directly impacts biodiversity and ecosystem health, which are central to SDG 15 (Life on Land). The loss of these beetles, which contribute to soil fertility and serve as a food source for other animals, negatively affects the overall health of terrestrial ecosystems.