nytimes.com
Covert Apprehension Plan
Two individuals discuss methods for apprehending a target, debating the risks of forceful entry versus a more covert approach, and also discussing payment for the operation.
English
United States
Human Rights ViolationsUs PoliticsFinanceStrategyPlanningRiskassessmentOperation
RiveraShakeriVictim-1
- What was the main strategy discussed for apprehending Victim-1?
- RIVERA and SHAKERI discussed the difficulty of apprehending Victim-1, emphasizing the need for patience and rejecting the idea of a forceful entry into her residence.
- What alternative method for apprehending Victim-1 did Rivera suggest?
- RIVERA reiterated the futility of forcing entry, highlighting the ease of apprehending Victim-1 while she was entering or exiting her vehicle as a better alternative.
- What were Rivera's concerns regarding a forceful entry into Victim-1's home?
- RIVERA acknowledged the risks associated with a forceful entry, noting the quiet neighborhood and the potential for increased attention. He favored a less conspicuous approach.
- What advice did Shakeri give Rivera regarding approaching Victim-1's residence?
- Shakeri advised Rivera to be patient and avoid a forceful entry, describing it as a "suicide move." He suggested waiting for Victim-1 to enter or leave her home.
- What financial aspects of the operation were discussed between Rivera and Shakeri?
- RIVERA discussed payment for the operation, complaining about the insufficient funds provided and outlining the expenses incurred, including vehicle rental, fuel, and tolls.