dw.com
CPAC Hungary 2025: Rise of Right-Wing Populism in Europe
The CPAC Hungary 2025 conference in Budapest saw high attendance from leading European right-wing populists, expressing discontent with the EU and promoting a 'new era of patriots' under Viktor Orban's leadership, raising concerns about his growing influence and network.
- How does the network established by Viktor Orban contribute to the rise of right-wing populism in Europe?
- The conference showcased a network built by Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban, promoting him as a role model for right-wing populists. This network includes government-funded institutions like the Danube Institute and Mathias Corvinus Collegium, facilitating collaboration among like-minded academics and activists across Europe and beyond.
- What are the immediate impacts of the high attendance of European right-wing populist leaders at the CPAC Hungary 2025 conference?
- The CPAC Hungary 2025 conference, held recently in Budapest, saw high attendance from prominent right-wing populist leaders across Europe. Participants expressed dissatisfaction with threats to national sovereignty, primarily from the European Union and what they termed a 'gender and wokeness craze.' They declared a new 'era of patriots.'
- What are the potential long-term consequences of Orban's network and its influence on the European Union and other national governments?
- Orban's network aims to trigger a chain reaction leading to pan-European changes, but its long-term impact remains uncertain. While the conference demonstrated Orban's influence, the stability of his alliances and their effect on EU legislation are unclear, with notable absences from France's far-right.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article's framing emphasizes the success and growing influence of the right-wing populist network, presenting Orban as a key figure and role model. The headline, if there was one (not provided), likely reinforced this positive portrayal. The article's structure prioritizes information that supports the narrative of a rising right-wing populist force, potentially downplaying counterarguments or limitations to their influence.
Language Bias
The article uses loaded language such as "right-wing populist," "national sovereignty," and "gender and woke madness." These terms carry negative connotations and could influence readers' perceptions. More neutral alternatives might be "conservative," "national self-determination," and "social and cultural issues." The description of Orban's rhetoric as a "Trump hurricane" is highly charged and opinionated.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the CPAC Hungary event and the network of right-wing populist leaders, but omits discussion of potential counter-movements or opposing viewpoints to this growing influence. It also lacks detailed analysis of the specific policies advocated by these leaders and their potential impact on various segments of the population. The long-term consequences of this network's activities and the potential for backlash are not explored.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplistic view of a dichotomy between the right-wing populist movement and the EU, neglecting the nuances within both entities. The portrayal of a clear-cut 'us vs. them' narrative overlooks the internal complexities and diverse opinions within both the right-wing populist movement and the EU itself.
Gender Bias
The article predominantly focuses on male political figures, with women's perspectives largely absent. While Zsuzsanna Szelenyi is quoted, her role is secondary to the discussions of male leaders. The lack of female voices reduces the representation of diverse viewpoints and potentially reinforces existing gender imbalances within the political sphere.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights the rise of right-wing populist parties and their potential impact on democratic institutions and the rule of law. The creation of networks by leaders like Orban, coupled with the potential for repressive legislation targeting dissenting voices, poses a threat to democratic governance and the principle of checks and balances. This directly undermines SDG 16, which aims to promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access to justice for all, and build effective, accountable, and inclusive institutions at all levels.