sueddeutsche.de
Credit Suisse Concealed Nazi-Linked Accounts Until 2020
The Credit Suisse hid bank accounts linked to Nazi criminals until 2020, obstructing investigations by the Bergier Commission and Neil Barofsky, whose upcoming report will reveal further details despite Swiss banking secrecy laws.
- What specific evidence reveals the extent of Credit Suisse's concealment of Nazi-linked accounts and its impact on historical investigations?
- The Credit Suisse concealed bank accounts linked to Nazi criminals until at least 2020, despite the Bergier Commission's 2002 investigation into Nazi-era assets in Switzerland. This was revealed by Neil Barofsky's investigation, commissioned by the US Senate, which found accounts remained active far beyond what was previously known. The bank hindered previous investigations by withholding crucial documents.
- How did the actions of Credit Suisse and the limitations of the Bergier Commission affect the investigation of Nazi-era assets in Switzerland?
- The new findings demonstrate a pattern of obstruction and concealment by Swiss banks regarding Nazi-era assets. The Bergier Commission's limited access to Credit Suisse archives, as confirmed by commission member Harold James, hampered their ability to fully investigate the extent of Nazi involvement. This systemic issue highlights the challenges in uncovering historical financial crimes.
- What are the potential future implications of Barofsky's findings on Swiss banking secrecy laws and international efforts to recover assets linked to Nazi crimes?
- Barofsky's upcoming report, including a confidential version with names of account holders, suggests further revelations are likely. The continued protection of deceased Nazi's accounts under Swiss banking secrecy laws raises questions about accountability and justice. This case could pressure Switzerland to reform its banking secrecy laws and improve transparency regarding historical financial crimes.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The narrative strongly emphasizes Credit Suisse's actions and the uncovering of further Nazi-related accounts, framing the bank as the central actor and its actions as a primary focus of the story. This emphasis, while justified by the new information, might overshadow other significant aspects of the story, such as the broader systemic issues within Swiss banking or the responsibility of other entities. The headline (if one were to be created) could be framed to emphasize the systemic issues or the investigation itself, rather than simply focusing on the actions of Credit Suisse.
Language Bias
The article uses strong language like "Nazi-Schergen" (Nazi henchmen), "unterslagen" (suppressed), and "Steine in den Weg gelegt" (stones in the way). While accurately reflecting the severity of the actions, these terms could be perceived as somewhat inflammatory or subjective. More neutral alternatives might include "Nazi collaborators," "withheld," and "obstructed." The repeated emphasis on concealment and obstruction adds to a sense of deliberate wrongdoing.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on Credit Suisse's actions and omissions, but doesn't explore the actions of other Swiss banks in as much detail. While acknowledging the limitations of the Bergier commission's access, it doesn't delve into what steps, if any, other institutions took to prevent or uncover similar activities. The role of the Swiss government in protecting bank secrecy is also largely absent. This omission could leave readers with an incomplete understanding of the systemic nature of the problem.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplistic dichotomy between the actions of Credit Suisse and the efforts of investigators. While highlighting the bank's obstruction, it doesn't explore the complexities of historical investigations, resource limitations, or the challenges of accessing information after decades. The portrayal of the situation as a straightforward battle between good and evil might oversimplify the ethical and legal intricacies involved.
Gender Bias
The article predominantly focuses on male actors (bank officials, historians, investigators), with limited attention paid to the experiences or perspectives of women affected by Nazi crimes. The gender of individuals mentioned is not explicitly relevant to the narrative, suggesting the focus on male figures may be a subtle bias.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights the ongoing investigation into Credit Suisse's handling of Nazi-era assets. The pursuit of justice for victims of Nazi crimes and the accountability of financial institutions complicit in hiding looted assets directly contributes to SDG 16 (Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions) by promoting justice, strengthening institutions, and combating impunity. The investigation aims to bring to light historical injustices and ensure that those responsible are held accountable, which aligns with the goals of this SDG.