repubblica.it
Criptopoetica: Art in the Age of Technological Opacity
Nadim Samman's "Criptopoetica" analyzes how contemporary art interprets the hidden mechanisms of technology, revealing its impact on individual freedom and social interaction through concepts like the 'Platopticon' and the phenomenon of hikikomori.
- How does Nadim Samman's "Criptopoetica" reveal the hidden consequences of technology's impact on contemporary life?
- Nadim Samman's "Criptopoetica" explores how contemporary art confronts the opacity of our technological environment, arguing that technology's wonders often mask hidden consequences. The book analyzes how artists interpret proprietary algorithms and opaque technological systems, revealing the ways technology shapes our lives and potentially limits our freedoms.
- What artistic strategies does Samman analyze to understand the complex relationship between technology and human experience?
- Samman's thesis highlights the inherent contradictions of our technologically advanced society: while technology promises transparency, it often creates opacity. The book uses contemporary art to illustrate how technology controls and shapes our experiences, impacting our social interactions and sense of self. This is exemplified by the concept of the "Platopticon," a technological system of confinement.
- What are the long-term implications of the 'Platopticon' concept as a model for understanding technology's influence on individual freedom and social interaction?
- Criptopoetica" suggests that art offers a critical lens for understanding the hidden impacts of technology. By examining artistic interpretations of algorithms and technological systems, the book reveals the potentially isolating and controlling aspects of our hyper-connected world, highlighting the need for critical analysis of technological advancements and their societal effects. The analysis of hikikomori, individuals who withdraw from society, illustrates the potential for technology to create new forms of isolation.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing of the article strongly emphasizes the negative aspects of technology and its impact, focusing on themes of seclusion, control, and manipulation. The title and introduction set a tone of suspicion and critique, potentially predisposing the reader to view technology primarily through a negative lens. While this perspective is valid, it would benefit from a more balanced approach that acknowledges technological progress and potential benefits alongside the critical analysis.
Language Bias
The article uses strong, evocative language to describe the negative aspects of technology, such as "dark side," "imperscrutable world," "entrapped," and "suffocating." These terms carry strong negative connotations that could sway the reader's perception. While such language adds impact, it could be mitigated by incorporating more neutral terms alongside the evocative language. For example, instead of "dark side," the author could use "hidden consequences" or "unintended effects.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses primarily on the critique of technology's hidden aspects and its impact on society, as viewed by Nadim Samman. While it mentions the positive aspects of technology, it doesn't delve into specific examples or counterarguments to balance the overwhelmingly negative perspective. This omission might limit the reader's ability to form a fully informed opinion, potentially leading to an unbalanced understanding of the complex relationship between technology and society. Further investigation into the benefits and societal advancements enabled by technology would enhance the article's objectivity.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplistic dichotomy between the 'marvel' of technology presented by technological capitalism and its hidden, darker side. While this contrast highlights important criticisms, it simplifies the multifaceted nature of technological advancement, potentially overlooking nuances and less extreme perspectives. The article could benefit from acknowledging the potential for both positive and negative impacts of technological advancements, avoiding an overly binary framing.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights how technology, while offering benefits, can also exacerbate inequalities. The "opacità del nostro ambiente tecnologico" (opacity of our technological environment) creates a digital divide, where access and understanding of technology are unevenly distributed, leading to social exclusion and reinforcing existing inequalities. The hikikomori phenomenon illustrates this, showing how technology can isolate individuals and limit opportunities. The proprietary nature of technological mechanisms further entrenches this inequality, as access to and control over technology remain concentrated in the hands of a few.