dw.com
Croatia's Invisible Migration Crisis: Schengen's Impact and Germany's Deportations
In the first ten months of 2024, Croatia registered 26,534 illegal border crossings; however, due to stricter border controls since joining Schengen, most migrants remain hidden, leaving only discarded belongings as evidence of their passage. Germany plans to deport 16,000 migrants to Croatia.
- What are the immediate consequences of Croatia's Schengen accession on migrant flows and visibility within the country?
- In the first ten months of 2024, Croatian authorities registered 26,534 illegal border crossings, mostly by citizens of Afghanistan, Syria, Turkey, Russia, and Egypt. Many migrants pass through Croatia en route to other European countries, leaving behind visible traces of their journey in the form of discarded belongings. This contrasts with the lack of visible migrants in Croatian cities, unlike in Bosnia, Austria, or Italy.
- How do differing levels of migrant criminalization and illegalization across Europe influence the visibility and public interaction with migrants?
- Croatia's Schengen membership has significantly altered the migration patterns. While previously a seven-day pass allowed transit, the current stricter regime forces migrants into hiding, resulting in an 'invisible migration' phenomenon. The increased risk of detention and pushbacks deters public visibility, unlike in countries like Italy or Bosnia where migrants feel safer.
- What are the long-term implications of Germany's planned deportations to Croatia and the overall 'invisible migration' phenomenon for both Croatia and the EU's migration policy?
- The future may see increased pressure on Croatia as Germany seeks to return asylum seekers under the Dublin Regulation. Although Croatia has shown willingness to cooperate, the current system leads to a largely invisible yet significant migration flow through the country, posing challenges for both humanitarian aid and effective border management. The potential for increased deportations from Germany raises concerns about Croatia's capacity to handle returns.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing of the article centers on the challenges and negative consequences associated with migration through Croatia. The headline (if there was one, it's missing from the provided text) would likely emphasize the difficulties faced by migrants or the strain on Croatian resources. The emphasis on illegal crossings, the hidden nature of migration, and the focus on discarded belongings all contribute to a negative portrayal of the situation.
Language Bias
The language used, while factually accurate, tends to focus on negative aspects. Terms such as "brutality," "illegal crossings," "hiding," and "nasilno vraćanja" (forced returns) contribute to a harsh portrayal of the situation. More neutral terms like "irregular crossings," "migration challenges," and "border control measures" could lessen the negative impact.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the negative aspects of migration through Croatia, mentioning challenges faced by migrants but omitting potential positive contributions or integration efforts. The lack of information on successful integration stories or the perspectives of Croatian citizens who may support migrants creates an incomplete picture. While acknowledging space constraints is important, more balanced reporting could include examples of successful integration or community support initiatives.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat false dichotomy between the visibility of migrants in other countries and their invisibility in Croatia. While it's true that migrants may be more visible in some areas, the claim of invisibility ignores the evidence of their presence through the discarded items found by hikers. The narrative simplifies a complex issue by focusing on the contrast rather than acknowledging the various realities of migration within Croatia.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights the plight of migrants who are forced to hide and leave behind their belongings, indicating a lack of basic necessities and potential economic hardship. The pushbacks and lack of support contribute to their vulnerability and perpetuate a cycle of poverty.