lexpress.fr
Crumbling US Infrastructure: A $1.2 Trillion Problem
The American Society of Civil Engineers rated US roads a D+ in 2025, citing 40% of major roads and 45% of bridges in poor condition due to underfunding and aging infrastructure; the IIJA's $1.2 trillion investment is slow to materialize due to inflation and regulatory hurdles, while French firms expand their presence.
- What is the current state of US roads and bridges, and what are the most immediate consequences of this condition?
- The American Society of Civil Engineers gave US roads a D+ rating in 2025, with nearly 40% of major roads in poor or mediocre condition. This is due to decades of heavy use on post-war infrastructure and is further evidenced by 45% of bridges exceeding their 50-year lifespan, necessitating repairs or replacement. The collapse of the Baltimore bridge in March 2024 highlighted this vulnerability.
- Why is the US facing a significant infrastructure deficit, and what are the main factors contributing to underfunding?
- Underinvestment, stemming from a lack of federal transportation planning and inconsistent state-level fiscal policies, is the primary cause of the deteriorated US infrastructure. Funding relies heavily on a fuel tax that hasn't increased since 1993, failing to keep pace with inflation and decreasing fuel consumption. This shortfall delays necessary maintenance, estimated to cost over $800 billion.
- How will the change in US presidential administration and the IIJA funds affect the future of US infrastructure development and maintenance?
- Despite the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act's (IIJA) $1.2 trillion allocation, project implementation has been slow due to factors like inflation increasing material costs and bureaucratic hurdles. While the return of a Trump administration might lead to deregulation and increased private investment, the focus on new road construction over crucial maintenance remains a concern. French construction firms like Vinci, Colas, and Egis are capitalizing on this situation.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the issue primarily through a negative lens, emphasizing the dilapidated state of US infrastructure and the slow progress of repair efforts. The headline (if there was one) would likely reinforce this negative framing. The inclusion of anecdotes about delayed projects and stalled funding further amplifies the negative narrative. The focus on the failures of past administrations to adequately address the issue reinforces a sense of crisis.
Language Bias
The article employs language that leans towards negativity, using words and phrases like "déliquescence," "mauvais ou médiocre," "dégradées," and "vulnérabilité." While these terms accurately reflect the state of the infrastructure, the repeated use of such strong negative language contributes to a consistently pessimistic tone. More neutral alternatives could include phrases like "in need of repair," "showing signs of deterioration," or "requiring maintenance.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the negative aspects of US infrastructure, particularly the poor condition of roads and bridges. While it mentions the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA), it doesn't delve into the successes or positive impacts of the act, potentially creating a skewed perception of its effectiveness. The article also omits discussion of potential long-term solutions beyond increased funding, such as innovative materials or construction techniques. This omission might limit readers' understanding of the full scope of the problem and potential solutions.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a false dichotomy by suggesting that the only solution to the problem of deteriorating infrastructure is increased funding. While funding is crucial, the article overlooks other factors such as efficient project management, streamlined permitting processes, and innovative construction methods that could improve the situation.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights the significant deterioration of US infrastructure, particularly roads and bridges. A large percentage are in poor condition, exceeding their lifespan, and requiring extensive repairs or replacement. This directly impacts the quality and sustainability of infrastructure, hindering economic growth and posing safety risks. The slow implementation of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) further exacerbates the issue, demonstrating a gap between policy and effective implementation for infrastructure development and maintenance.