nrc.nl
Cyberattack Cripples US in Netflix's "Zero Day
Zero Day" is a Netflix miniseries about a cyberattack that kills over 3,000 Americans by causing nationwide infrastructure failure, prompting former President Mullen (Robert De Niro) to lead an investigation into a complex web of conspiracies.
- What are the immediate consequences of the cyberattack depicted in "Zero Day", and how does this event highlight vulnerabilities in US infrastructure?
- Zero Day", a Netflix miniseries starring Robert De Niro and Angela Bassett, depicts a cyberattack that kills over 3,000 people by causing widespread infrastructure failure across the US. The attack shuts down all communication for a minute, resulting in train derailments, plane crashes, and traffic light outages. Former President Mullen (De Niro) is called upon to lead an investigation.
- How does the miniseries portray the roles of government, technology, and media in responding to and understanding the cyberattack, and what are its implications?
- The miniseries explores the aftermath of a crippling cyberattack, highlighting the government's struggle to identify the perpetrator and prevent future attacks. The investigation led by Mullen uncovers multiple conspiracies and secrets, but many critical questions remain unanswered, leaving the audience with a sense of incompletion. The series contrasts the initial blockbuster-style depiction of the attack with a more complex and convoluted narrative.
- What are the long-term implications of the narrative choices in "Zero Day," and how might the show's failure to resolve critical plotlines affect its overall reception and message?
- The show's fragmented narrative and ambiguous plot points, while potentially aiming for audience engagement, ultimately lead to viewer frustration. The lack of urgency in addressing the very real threat of cyberattacks and the underutilization of a talented cast detract from the series' overall impact. The unresolved questions and vague plotlines undermine the intended intrigue.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The review frames the series negatively from the start, highlighting its confusing plot and underutilized actors. The initial comparison to a 90s blockbuster sets an expectation that the series fails to meet, shaping the reader's perception.
Language Bias
The review uses strong, subjective language like "onnodig ingewikkeld" (unnecessarily complicated), "vaag" (vague), and "frustrerend" (frustrating). While descriptive, these terms could be replaced with more neutral alternatives like "complex," "unclear," and "disappointing.
Bias by Omission
The review mentions a lack of urgency and a failure to explore the realistic consequences of a cyberattack, focusing instead on a convoluted plot. The omission of a deeper dive into the societal impact of such an event is a significant oversight.
False Dichotomy
The review implies a false dichotomy between a simple, engaging plot (like a 90s blockbuster) and a complex, confusing one. It suggests that complexity is inherently negative, overlooking the potential for sophisticated storytelling.