forbes.com
Daesh Remains a Global Threat: 10 Years After Libya Beach Killings
On February 15, 2025, the tenth anniversary of Daesh's murder of 21 Coptic Christians and one Ghanaian in Libya, the UN Security Council reported Daesh remains a serious global threat, active in Iraq, Syria, and expanding its operations and territorial control across Africa, using online propaganda for recruitment and plotting attacks globally.
- How does Daesh exploit regional instability to expand its operations and influence?
- Daesh's enduring threat stems from its exploitation of instability in conflict zones like Syria and the Sahel region of Africa, where it expands its territorial control and deadly attacks. The group leverages online propaganda for recruitment and inspires attacks globally, as exemplified by the foiled attack plot in France.
- What is the current global threat posed by Daesh, a decade after the 2015 beach killings in Libya?
- Ten years after Daesh's (ISIS) murder of 21 Coptic Christians and one Ghanaian on a Libyan beach, the UN Security Council confirmed Daesh remains a significant global threat, maintaining operations in Iraq, Syria, and expanding in Africa. Their attacks target civilians, schools, and spread through online propaganda, highlighting the continued need for international counter-terrorism efforts.
- What innovative counter-terrorism strategies are needed to address Daesh's evolving tactics and technological capabilities?
- The evolving threat of Daesh necessitates a comprehensive strategy beyond military action. Addressing the root causes of instability, improving intelligence sharing, and countering online radicalization through technological advancements are crucial. The increasing use of advanced technology by Daesh, including AI-driven propaganda, requires innovative countermeasures.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames Daesh as an ongoing and adaptable threat, emphasizing its continued activity and evolving tactics. This focus, while factually accurate, might inadvertently downplay the progress made in combating the group in certain regions. The headline, if present, would likely reinforce this emphasis on the enduring danger.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral and objective. Terms like "atrocities," "horrific," and "brutal" are used to describe Daesh's actions, but this is appropriate given the context. The use of the term Daesh, instead of ISIS or ISIL, reflects a preference by some to avoid terms that some people find offensive.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on Daesh's continued threat and global activities, but lacks detail on the long-term impact on the victims' families and communities in Libya and Egypt. While mentioning the exodus of Egyptian Copts from Libya, it doesn't explore the social and economic consequences of this displacement. Additionally, there's limited information on the support and aid provided to affected communities in the aftermath of the 2015 attacks. The article also omits discussion of how other groups have responded to the Daesh threat, focusing primarily on the UN's perspective.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights Daesh's continued global threat, attacks on civilians (including children), and exploitation of instability. This directly undermines peace, justice, and strong institutions, hindering efforts towards a peaceful and inclusive society. The UN Security Council's discussions underscore the ongoing struggle against terrorism and the need for international cooperation to address this threat.