Declining Contraceptive Use in the UK Linked to Rise in Abortions

Declining Contraceptive Use in the UK Linked to Rise in Abortions

theguardian.com

Declining Contraceptive Use in the UK Linked to Rise in Abortions

A study by the British Pregnancy Advisory Service (Bpas) reveals a concerning trend: from 2018-2023, the percentage of women seeking abortions who reported using no contraception increased from 56% to 70%, while the use of fertility awareness-based methods rose slightly, from 0.4% to 2.5%.

English
United Kingdom
HealthGender IssuesWomenContraception
British Pregnancy Advisory Service (Bpas)Family Planning AssociationFood And Drug Administration
Bekki Burbidge
What factors contribute to the decline in hormonal contraceptive use and the rise in alternative methods?
The rise in fertility awareness-based methods, while notable, is dwarfed by the significant increase in women not using any contraception. This trend is partly attributed to a growing distrust of hormonal methods, fueled by wellness culture and online discussions of side effects. The shift away from hormonal contraception is substantial, dropping from almost half of respondents in 2013-14 to 27% in 2022-23.
What are the key trends in contraceptive use among women seeking abortions in the UK, and what are the immediate implications?
Between 2018 and 2023, the use of fertility awareness-based methods among women seeking abortions at the British Pregnancy Advisory Service (Bpas) increased from 0.4% to 2.5%. Concurrently, the percentage of women seeking abortions who were not using any contraception rose from 56% to 70%. This indicates a concerning trend of declining contraceptive use.
What are the long-term implications of declining contraceptive use and limited contraceptive options for public health and women's reproductive autonomy?
The declining use of contraception, coupled with limited options and increased difficulty accessing abortion services, points to a critical need for more contraceptive choices. The lack of a readily available, effective, and well-tolerated non-hormonal option leaves many women with limited satisfactory options, leading to unintended pregnancies and increased demand for abortion services. Future research should focus on expanding contraceptive options and improving access to comprehensive reproductive healthcare.

Cognitive Concepts

3/5

Framing Bias

The framing emphasizes the difficulties and challenges women face with contraception, particularly highlighting the rise in fertility awareness method usage alongside a concerning increase in unintended pregnancies. This framing, while based on factual data, could unintentionally create a narrative of widespread contraceptive failure and dissatisfaction, potentially overshadowing the successful use of contraceptives by many women.

3/5

Language Bias

The language used is largely emotive and subjective, particularly in the opening paragraphs describing the author's personal experiences. Phrases like "decades-long quest," "uncooperative bodies," and "fug of sadness" inject a strong emotional tone that might not be entirely reflective of the experiences of all women. While this personal approach is engaging, it could skew the overall objectivity of the analysis. More neutral language could enhance clarity and reduce bias.

3/5

Bias by Omission

The article focuses heavily on the experiences of women seeking abortions and using fertility awareness methods, potentially omitting the perspectives and experiences of women who successfully use various contraceptive methods without complications. The article also doesn't delve into the potential role of government policies or healthcare access in influencing contraceptive choices and abortion rates. While acknowledging limitations of space, a broader representation of contraceptive experiences could have enriched the narrative.

3/5

False Dichotomy

The article presents a false dichotomy by framing the choice as primarily between hormonal contraception and fertility awareness methods, overlooking other contraceptive options available such as barrier methods, IUDs, etc. This simplification might mislead readers into believing that these are the only two viable options.

2/5

Gender Bias

The article's focus is overwhelmingly on women's experiences with contraception. While this is understandable given the topic, it lacks the male perspective on contraception and family planning. Including male perspectives and exploring methods like the male pill could offer a more balanced view.

Sustainable Development Goals

Gender Equality Negative
Direct Relevance

The article highlights a decline in contraceptive use among women, leading to unintended pregnancies and impacting their reproductive health and autonomy. This negatively affects their ability to participate fully in society and achieve gender equality.