Deep Ocean Exploration: 99.999% Unseen

Deep Ocean Exploration: 99.999% Unseen

npr.org

Deep Ocean Exploration: 99.999% Unseen

A new study reveals that humans have only explored less than 0.001% of the deep ocean floor, an area smaller than Rhode Island, primarily near the U.S., Japan, and New Zealand, highlighting the vast unknown and the need for further exploration.

English
United States
OtherScienceBiodiversityScientific DiscoveryMarine BiologyDeep Sea ExplorationOcean ResearchUnseen Ocean
Ocean Discovery LeagueUniversity Of Southampton
Katy Croff BellJon CopleyNell Greenfieldboyce
How was the data on deep-sea exploration compiled, and what geographical biases are present in the current data?
The study, published in Science Advances, compiled data from global oceanographic institutions since 1958, quantifying the extent of human deep-sea exploration. The limited exploration reveals a significant gap in our understanding of deep-sea habitats and their connection to surface ecosystems.
What is the extent of human exploration of the deep ocean floor, and what are the immediate implications of this limited knowledge?
A recent study reveals that humans have only observed a minuscule 0.001% of the deep ocean floor, an area smaller than Rhode Island. This exploration, primarily concentrated near the U.S., Japan, and New Zealand, highlights the vast unknown of the deep sea.
What technological advancements could facilitate more comprehensive and diverse exploration of the deep ocean floor, and how might this impact our understanding of deep-sea ecosystems?
The findings underscore the need for a more systematic, global approach to deep-sea exploration. Utilizing cost-effective technologies could broaden participation and accelerate the discovery of deep-sea biodiversity and its impact on global processes like nutrient cycling.

Cognitive Concepts

2/5

Framing Bias

The framing emphasizes the sheer scale of the unknown in the deep ocean, creating a sense of wonder and highlighting the limited human exploration. The use of terms like "tiny fraction" and "99.999% unseen" strongly emphasizes the vastness of the unexplored area. This might lead the audience to focus more on the mystery of the deep sea rather than the potential risks or benefits of increased exploration.

1/5

Language Bias

The language used is largely neutral and objective, using precise data and descriptive language to convey the scientific findings. Terms like "ghost sharks" and "vampire squid" are used for dramatic effect but do not skew the scientific presentation.

3/5

Bias by Omission

The report focuses heavily on the unexplored areas of the ocean floor, but omits discussion of the potential economic interests (mining, resource extraction) that might drive further exploration. It also doesn't discuss the potential environmental impacts of increased deep-sea exploration. This omission limits a comprehensive understanding of the implications of the findings.

Sustainable Development Goals

Life Below Water Positive
Direct Relevance

The research highlights the vast unexplored areas of the deep ocean, emphasizing the need for further exploration and understanding of this crucial ecosystem. The findings underscore the importance of protecting the deep ocean, its biodiversity, and its role in global processes. Further research and exploration can directly inform conservation efforts and sustainable management of marine resources.