dw.com
Desertification Threatens Global Food Security
Nearly half of Earth's land, supporting 45% of global agriculture, faces desertification due to extreme drought linked to human-caused climate change, threatening food security and causing mass displacement; the UN aims to restore 1.5 billion hectares by 2030.
- What are the immediate consequences of desertification impacting global food security and human well-being?
- Nearly half of the planet's solid surface, crucial for 45% of global agriculture, is at risk of becoming barren desert due to extreme drought exacerbated by human-caused global warming. This threatens food security, poverty, and mass displacement for one-third of the world's population residing in arid regions.
- How do climate change, unsustainable land use practices, and social factors contribute to the desertification crisis?
- The UNCCD aims to restore 1.5 billion hectares of desertified land by 2030, a goal partially hampered by insufficient funding. Desertification, driven by climate change, deforestation, unsustainable farming, and overgrazing, leads to biodiversity loss, hunger, and poverty, impacting the planet's ability to support human well-being.
- What are the long-term implications of continued desertification, and what innovative solutions are needed to achieve large-scale land restoration?
- Addressing desertification requires sustainable agriculture, natural-positive land management, and watershed conservation. Initiatives like the Great Green Wall in Africa and similar projects in China and Mongolia aim to combat desertification through reforestation and sustainable land management, though progress is slow due to funding shortages and the need for widespread adoption of sustainable practices.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article presents a balanced framing of the desertification problem. While highlighting the urgency and severity of the situation, it also presents various solutions and ongoing initiatives to address it. The introduction effectively sets the stage without overly sensationalizing or downplaying the issue. The inclusion of quotes from UN officials adds credibility and reinforces the seriousness of the situation.
Language Bias
The language used in the article is largely neutral and objective. It avoids sensationalist or alarmist language and presents information in a factual and informative manner. While terms like "grave degradation" and "extreme drought" are used, these are justified given the severity of the issue and are not presented with an overtly emotional or biased tone.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the impact of desertification and the efforts to combat it, but it could benefit from including diverse perspectives on the socio-economic factors contributing to land degradation in different regions. For example, while it mentions women's land ownership issues, a deeper exploration of the complexities of land tenure and access to resources in various cultural contexts would enrich the analysis. Additionally, the article could benefit from including information about potential technological solutions and innovations being developed to combat desertification, beyond the large-scale initiatives mentioned.
Gender Bias
The article touches upon gender inequality in land ownership, noting that women often invest in more biodiverse food systems than men, who focus on high-yield monocultures. This highlights a potential gendered dimension to land degradation. However, the analysis could be strengthened by exploring this aspect in more detail, offering more specific examples and examining other ways gender might influence desertification and its solutions.
Sustainable Development Goals
Desertification is causing land degradation, leading to decreased agricultural productivity and food insecurity. The article highlights that nearly half of the planet's solid surface is at risk of becoming barren desert, impacting 45% of global agriculture. This directly threatens food security for 1 in 3 people living in arid regions and accelerates the loss of biodiversity and hunger.