zeit.de
DESG Congress Ends in Disarray Over Rejected Financial Report
The German Speed Skating and Short Track Association (DESG) congress in Berlin ended in disarray after members rejected the 2020 financial report due to procedural irregularities, leading President Matthias Große to abruptly adjourn the meeting and announce potential changes to the association's headquarters and training centers.
- What immediate consequences resulted from the rejection of the DESG's 2020 financial report?
- The German Speed Skating and Short Track Association (DESG) congress ended abruptly when President Matthias Große adjourned the meeting before the scheduled presidential election. This followed the rejection of the 2020 annual financial report by a vote of 65 to 73. The rejection prompted Große to call off the meeting.
- What procedural irregularities led to the rejection of the 2020 financial report, and what are the potential consequences?
- The rejection of the financial report, despite its review by tax advisors and approval by the Federal Ministry of the Interior, was due to procedural irregularities cited by clubs and state associations. These included the late distribution of the audit report and the absence of the auditor's recommendation to discharge the presidium.
- What are the long-term implications of the potential relocation of the DESG headquarters and the possible closure of national training centers?
- The controversy may lead to a motion for an extraordinary general meeting to oust the presidium. Furthermore, the planned relocation of the association's headquarters from Berlin to Inzell and the potential closure of two of four speed skating national training centers adds to the uncertainty surrounding the future of the organization. The potential closure of training centers in Erfurt and Chemnitz is particularly concerning.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing emphasizes the president's perspective and portrays the vote against the annual report as an unjustified 'eklat'. The headline (if any) likely would reflect this framing. The focus on the president's reactions and justifications shapes the narrative to downplay the concerns of the dissenting members.
Language Bias
The use of words like "Eklat" (a scandal or uproar) frames the dissenting vote negatively. The description of the dissenting members' actions as producing an "Eklat" is loaded language. Neutral alternatives could include "controversy" or "dispute." The phrase "vorbildliche Arbeit" (exemplary work) is also potentially loaded and could be replaced with a more neutral description of the association's activities.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on President Große's perspective and statements, potentially omitting counterarguments or perspectives from the Vereins and Landesverbände who voted against the annual report. It doesn't detail the specific formal violations cited by these groups, limiting the reader's understanding of their concerns. The reasons behind the potential relocation of the Verband's headquarters and the closure of ice skating centers are also presented primarily from Große's viewpoint, lacking detailed explanations or opposing viewpoints.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a false dichotomy by portraying the situation as either a 'model work' by the presidency or an 'eclat' caused by others. This simplification ignores the possibility of legitimate concerns regarding the financial management of the DESG and the potential for misunderstandings or procedural errors.