pda.kp.ru
Discrepancy between Advertised and Real Prices for New-Build Apartments in Russia
In April 2025, unsold new-build apartments in major Russian cities increased by one-third, yet prices rose slightly in most cities, revealing a gap between listed and actual transaction prices; this is a strategic tactic by developers to encourage early sales, while buyers should negotiate for discounts.
- What is the key market dynamic explaining the simultaneous rise in unsold inventory and modest price increases in Russian new-build apartments?
- In April 2025, unsold inventory of completed apartments in major Russian cities rose by a third compared to March, according to Yandex Real Estate. However, despite this increase in supply, prices in 51 out of 70 major cities still rose, albeit modestly at 0.5% compared to 1.4% in March. This indicates a divergence between listed prices and actual transaction prices.
- How do the strategies employed by developers to manage inventory and pricing impact buyers, especially those seeking government-backed mortgages?
- The discrepancy between advertised prices and actual sales prices reflects a strategic approach by developers. They consistently increase listed prices to incentivize early purchases and secure favorable bank financing, despite a stagnant market. This is supported by DOM.RF data showing a decrease in real prices for new builds in Q1 2025.
- What are the potential long-term implications of the widening gap between advertised and actual prices for the Russian real estate market and consumer confidence?
- The widening gap between advertised and actual prices highlights the importance of negotiation for buyers. Developers, particularly in Moscow, are offering incentives like extended payment plans to stimulate sales. Savvy buyers can leverage this imbalance, along with comparing prices of similar units at varying stages of completion, to negotiate significant discounts.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the narrative around the developers' perspective, highlighting their challenges and strategies to maintain high prices. The challenges faced by buyers are mentioned but downplayed, leading to a potentially unbalanced portrayal of the market situation. The headline (if any) likely emphasizes the developers' difficulties rather than the broader market complexities.
Language Bias
The article uses some potentially loaded language. For instance, phrases like "don't rush to rub your hands in anticipation of falling prices" and "the developers will never publicly announce a price cut" reveal a subtle bias towards the developers' perspective. More neutral alternatives could include, "There's currently no indication of significant price decreases" and "Public price reductions from developers are uncommon". The use of terms like 'smarter' buyers adds a value judgment.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the perspective of real estate developers and experts, potentially omitting the views of average homebuyers facing challenges in the market. While the challenges faced by developers are discussed, the article doesn't delve into the struggles of buyers, especially those relying on subsidized mortgages. This omission might skew the reader's understanding of the overall market dynamics.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a false dichotomy by suggesting that buyers must either purchase pre-construction apartments at a lower price (with inherent risks) or wait for ready-to-move-in apartments at higher prices. It doesn't sufficiently explore alternative strategies or market conditions that might offer different solutions.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights a growing gap between advertised prices and actual transaction prices for new apartments in Russia. While advertised prices continue to rise, real prices are stagnating or even falling. This suggests that although prices are nominally increasing, negotiation and market forces are preventing the most vulnerable from being disproportionately affected by price increases. The advice given to buyers to negotiate and leverage market conditions to get better deals directly supports efforts to reduce inequality in access to housing.