cnn.com
Doomerism: The Growing Feeling of Impending Doom
A growing number of people, especially among younger generations, are experiencing 'doomerism,' a feeling of impending doom fueled by negative news coverage and social media echo chambers focused on global challenges like climate change and political instability; this leads to anxiety, depression, and a sense of helplessness, but some are adapting with humor and short-term goal setting.
- Why has 'doomerism' become prevalent, and what role do media, social media, and information overload play in its development?
- The shift toward 'doomerism' stems from negative, catastrophic messaging in media about climate change and other global issues. This lack of hope, coupled with information overload and social media echo chambers reinforcing negative viewpoints, contributes to feelings of doom and pessimism. The absence of solutions in the narrative exacerbates these feelings.
- What are the immediate consequences of the widespread feeling of impending doom, or 'doomerism,' and which demographics are most affected?
- The immediate impact of 'doomerism' is a 70% increase in adult anxiety regarding current events, particularly among Millennials and Gen Z, linked to climate change, political instability, and a perceived lack of solutions. This manifests as feelings of helplessness and an inability to contribute to positive change, potentially leading to depression and anxiety.
- What are the potential long-term societal and individual consequences of 'doomerism,' and are there any countervailing trends or coping strategies?
- The long-term effects of 'doomerism' could include increased mental health issues and societal inaction on pressing global challenges. However, the reappropriation of negative terms as humor among younger generations suggests a potential coping mechanism. Focusing on achievable short-term goals and fostering social connections could counteract the negative impacts of this trend.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames "doomerism" largely as a problem to be solved, emphasizing the negative consequences of excessive negativity. This framing could inadvertently minimize the validity of concerns driving this perspective. While it acknowledges the anxieties around climate change, political instability, and other global issues, it quickly pivots to solutions focused on individual coping mechanisms, potentially downplaying the need for broader societal action.
Language Bias
While the article aims for neutrality, the repeated use of terms like "doom," "gloomy," "catastrophic," and "helpless" contributes to a negative tone. While these words accurately reflect some of the anxieties discussed, their frequent use could amplify negative feelings in the reader. More neutral alternatives could include "concern," "challenges," "uncertainty," or "complex issues.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the negative aspects of "doomerism" and the impact of negative news consumption, but it omits discussion of potential benefits of awareness about global issues like climate change. While acknowledging the detrimental effects of information overload, it doesn't explore the potential for informed action stemming from such awareness. It also lacks counterpoints to the negative portrayal of social media, neglecting the positive aspects of community building and information sharing.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplistic dichotomy between "doomerism" and hope, neglecting the nuanced spectrum of emotional responses to current events. While acknowledging that excessive negativity is harmful, it doesn't fully explore the valid concerns underlying the "doomer" perspective. The solutions offered are largely individualistic, overlooking the need for systemic change.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article discusses the rising phenomenon of "doomerism," characterized by anxiety and dread stemming from global events. This negatively impacts mental health, increasing rates of depression and anxiety, particularly among younger generations. The article highlights the role of information overload and negative social media messaging in exacerbating these feelings.