nos.nl
Dutch A-Brand Supermarket Sales Drop 9% in 2024
The top 100 A-brands in Dutch supermarkets experienced a 9% sales drop in 2024 compared to 2023, primarily due to a tobacco sales ban and increased competition from store brands, alongside distribution issues stemming from retailer conflicts.
- What are the main reasons for the 9% decrease in sales of the top 100 A-brands in Dutch supermarkets in 2024?
- In 2024, sales of the top 100 A-brands in Dutch supermarkets decreased by 9% compared to 2023, largely due to a ban on tobacco sales. This decline continues a longer trend of decreasing relevance for A-brands, with their market share falling below 20% from nearly 25% in 2005.
- How did the disputes between manufacturers and supermarket chains affect the sales of A-brands, and what are the long-term implications?
- The decline is attributed to several factors: the tobacco ban, increased consumer preference for fresh products (a category where A-brands have less presence), and the rising popularity of cheaper store brands. Disputes between manufacturers and supermarket chains also contributed significantly to decreased sales for brands like Bonduelle, Senseo, De Ruijter, and Quaker, which experienced boycotts or supply disruptions.
- What future strategies should A-brands adopt to regain market share in the face of growing competition from private-label brands and changing consumer preferences?
- The ongoing shift away from A-brands suggests a long-term trend towards greater price sensitivity among consumers and the growing success of store brands. Future success for A-brands will likely hinge on adapting to changing consumer preferences and navigating disputes with supermarket chains more effectively. The increased popularity of private-label brands may further erode the market share of established brands.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The headline and introductory paragraphs immediately establish a negative narrative around the performance of A-brands. The use of phrases like "slecht jaar" (bad year) and "uiterst mager jaar" (extremely meager year) sets a negative tone from the outset. The article primarily focuses on the decline of A-brands, giving less prominence to positive aspects or potential counter-arguments. While the inclusion of statistics provides some objectivity, the overall framing leans towards portraying the situation negatively for A-brands.
Language Bias
The article uses terms like "slecht jaar" (bad year) and "uiterst mager jaar" (extremely meager year) to describe the performance of A-brands. These terms are value-laden and contribute to a negative portrayal. The use of phrases such as "talloze ruzies" (countless quarrels) between manufacturers and supermarkets further intensifies the negative tone. Neutral alternatives could include describing the year as "challenging" or "difficult" and referring to the disputes as "disagreements" or "conflicts.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the decline of A-brands, providing numerous statistics and quotes supporting this narrative. However, it omits perspectives from A-brand manufacturers themselves. Their potential responses to the challenges (e.g., new marketing strategies, product diversification) are not explored. Additionally, the article doesn't delve into the broader economic context affecting the supermarket industry, such as inflation or changes in consumer spending habits, which could also contribute to the observed trends. While the inclusion of these perspectives may have exceeded the article's scope, their absence creates an incomplete picture.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplistic dichotomy between A-brands and private labels, suggesting that consumers are choosing one over the other. It implies that the decline of A-brands is directly due to the rise of private labels and consumer preference for cheaper options. The complexity of consumer behavior and other contributing factors, like price increases or product availability, are underrepresented, simplifying a nuanced issue.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights a shift in consumer behavior towards cheaper alternatives like private-label brands and fresh products, indicating a move towards more sustainable consumption patterns. The decline in sales of A-brands, partly due to a ban on tobacco sales, also suggests a reduction in consumption of products with potentially negative health and environmental impacts. Consumers are actively seeking cheaper alternatives ("Iedereen moet toch op de kleintjes letten. En huismerken zijn vaak net zo goed hoor."), which reflects a change towards responsible consumption.