nos.nl
Dutch Double-Barrelled Surnames: Legal Challenges and Reform Needed
A new Dutch law allows children to have both parents' surnames; 8780 children received double-barrelled surnames in 2023, plus 19,000 more used a transitional measure. However, 14 women have unsuccessfully challenged the lack of legal recourse when the other parent refuses consent.
- What are the immediate impacts of the new Dutch law allowing children to have double-barrelled surnames?
- In the Netherlands, 8780 children (6% of all births) received double-barrelled surnames in 2023, a new law allowing this. A further 19,000 families used a transitional measure to add a surname to children born between 2016 and 2023. However, this requires both parents' consent, creating issues.
- How has the requirement for both parents' consent to add a surname impacted legal proceedings and outcomes?
- The success of the new law allowing double-barrelled surnames hinges on parental agreement. This requirement has led to 14 women unsuccessfully challenging the denial of adding their surname to their child's name in court. The courts cite a lack of explicit dispute resolution within the law.
- What are the potential future implications and necessary legal reforms regarding parental consent for double-barrelled surnames in the Netherlands?
- The Dutch law, while intending to allow dual surnames, has created conflict for separated parents. The need for parental consent, coupled with the courts' refusal to grant substitute consent, has discriminatory implications, particularly impacting women whose children often bear the father's name traditionally. This situation calls for a legal amendment to grant courts this power and extend the transitional period.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing emphasizes the struggles of women and the shortcomings of the current law. While highlighting the issue is important, the headline and introductory paragraphs could be less emotionally charged and focus more on the neutral fact that the law has limitations without emphasizing difficulties faced by one gender more than the other.
Language Bias
The language used is occasionally emotionally charged. For example, phrases such as "vingen bot" (literally "caught a flat tire", figuratively "were unsuccessful") and the repeated emphasis on the women's struggles. More neutral language could replace emotionally charged descriptions.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the challenges faced by women in adding their surname to their children's names after separation, but it omits discussion of potential difficulties faced by men in similar situations. It also doesn't explore alternative solutions or legal frameworks used in other countries to address this issue. The article could benefit from a more balanced perspective on the difficulties of adding a surname after separation for both parents.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a false dichotomy by framing the issue as solely a conflict between the desire of mothers to add their surname and the refusal of fathers. It overlooks alternative solutions, such as mediation or different legal approaches.
Gender Bias
The article disproportionately focuses on women's experiences, presenting their perspective as the primary concern. While acknowledging the challenges faced by women, the piece should strive for more balanced gender representation and explore the experiences of fathers in comparable circumstances to avoid perpetuating gender stereotypes.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights how the current law disproportionately affects women, as children traditionally receive the father's surname, and women often face difficulties adding their surname without the father's consent. This creates inequality in the ability to pass on family names, reinforcing gender stereotypes and hindering equal rights.