Dutch Homelessness Increases; Blacklisting Policies Under Scrutiny

Dutch Homelessness Increases; Blacklisting Policies Under Scrutiny

nos.nl

Dutch Homelessness Increases; Blacklisting Policies Under Scrutiny

The number of homeless people in the Netherlands rose by 8 percent to roughly 33,000 in 2023; however, the actual figure is likely higher. Two individuals, blacklisted by housing corporation Trudo, have been homeless for four years due to their inability to secure a positive landlord reference, highlighting the severe impact of such policies.

Dutch
Netherlands
JusticeHuman Rights ViolationsHuman RightsNetherlandsHousing CrisisSocial JusticeHomelessnessBlacklisting
NosCentraal Bureau Voor De Statistiek (Cbs)TrudoAedes
Bas De VriesNienke Boesveldt
What are the immediate consequences of housing corporation blacklisting policies on individuals in the Netherlands?
The number of homeless individuals in the Netherlands increased by 8 percent to approximately 33,000 in 2023. This is based on CBS figures, which only include those aged 18-65, indicating the true number is likely higher. Two individuals, blacklisted by their housing corporation, have been homeless for four years, illustrating the policy's severe impact.
How do blacklisting policies intended to protect against problematic tenants affect those with less severe issues, and what are the broader societal implications?
The two individuals, denied housing due to a required positive landlord reference that their former housing corporation, Trudo, refuses to provide, exemplify the unintended consequences of blacklisting. This practice, while designed to protect against problematic tenants, disproportionately affects those with minor issues, contributing to homelessness.
What are the long-term effects of housing corporation blacklisting on individuals' well-being, and what systemic changes are needed to mitigate these negative consequences?
The long-term impact on individuals blacklisted by housing corporations, including prolonged homelessness and significant mental health consequences, raises ethical concerns regarding these policies. Further investigation into the number of people affected and the effectiveness of these practices is critical.

Cognitive Concepts

4/5

Framing Bias

The article frames the issue primarily through the experiences of the two individuals blacklisted by Trudo. While their story is compelling and highlights the human cost of blacklisting, the extensive detail given to their case might overshadow the broader societal and policy implications of the rising homelessness rate and the use of blacklists. The headline and introduction focus on the increase in homelessness, but quickly shift to the personal narrative. This prioritization subtly shifts the focus from systemic issues to individual cases, potentially influencing the audience to focus on individual responsibility over broader systemic issues.

2/5

Language Bias

The article uses emotionally charged language when describing the situation of the two individuals, referring to their situation as "inhumane" and describing them as "burned-out." While these words accurately reflect the suffering of the individuals, their use could evoke strong emotions in the reader, potentially swaying their opinion against blacklisting practices. Using more neutral language such as "difficult" or "challenging" for their situation might reduce emotional bias. The repeated use of words like "zwerven" (wander) adds to the sense of despair.

3/5

Bias by Omission

The article focuses heavily on the experiences of two individuals, offering a compelling narrative but potentially neglecting broader statistical trends and systemic issues beyond their specific case. While acknowledging the higher true number of homeless individuals, it doesn't delve into the reasons for this discrepancy beyond the age limitation of the CBS data. It also omits discussion on the effectiveness or potential alternatives to blacklisting as a solution for dealing with problematic tenants. The article also doesn't explore other potential causes of homelessness besides blacklisting.

3/5

False Dichotomy

The article presents a false dichotomy by implying that the only options for dealing with problematic tenants are either blacklisting them, leading to homelessness, or allowing them to cause "serious nuisance." It doesn't explore other possible solutions or interventions, such as mediation, tenant support programs, or other forms of conflict resolution.

Sustainable Development Goals

No Poverty Negative
Direct Relevance

The article highlights a significant rise in homelessness in the Netherlands, indicating a setback in efforts to alleviate poverty and ensure adequate housing for all. The case study of two individuals blacklisted by their housing corporation and subsequently struggling to find housing exemplifies the challenges faced by vulnerable populations in accessing essential resources.