nrc.nl
Dutch Jewish Resistance During WWII: Challenging the Narrative of Passivity
Ben Braber's new book, "Omdat ik geen lam voor de wolven wil zijn," reveals the active resistance of Dutch Jews during WWII, including armed groups and various forms of non-violent defiance, challenging the common narrative of passive victimhood.
- How does Ben Braber's book challenge the existing historical narrative regarding the behavior of Dutch Jews during the Holocaust?
- This contradicts the common perception of passive Jewish behavior during the Holocaust in the Netherlands. The book "Omdat ik geen lam voor de wolven wil zijn" by Ben Braber reveals diverse forms of Jewish resistance, from armed combat to public protests and aiding escapes, challenging the historical narrative.
- What forms of resistance did Amsterdam's Jewish population undertake during the early Nazi occupation, and what were the immediate consequences?
- In Amsterdam during the early Nazi occupation, Jewish groups actively resisted, engaging in armed confrontations with NSB members, using weapons like clubs and iron bars. One example is boxer Lard Zilverberg, who participated in such clashes and later died in Mauthausen concentration camp.
- What are the broader implications of Braber's findings for understanding collective memory and responsibility surrounding the Holocaust in the Netherlands?
- Braber's work highlights the wide spectrum of Jewish resistance in the Netherlands, countering the prevailing image of passivity. This challenges the historical narrative and prompts a reassessment of collective responsibility, given the exceptionally low survival rate of Dutch Jews during the war.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing emphasizes the active resistance of Dutch Jews, which effectively counters a common misconception. However, by selecting examples that show courageous acts of resistance, the article might unintentionally downplay the experiences of those who were unable to resist or were victims of circumstances. The headline and introduction highlight resistance, shaping the reader's initial perception.
Language Bias
The language used is generally neutral, although terms such as "makke lammeren" (easy lambs) could be interpreted as loaded. The author uses this phrase to contrast with the reality of Jewish resistance, but a more neutral alternative could have been used. While aiming to challenge stereotypes, certain word choices could unintentionally perpetuate some biases.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on acts of resistance by Jewish individuals during WWII in the Netherlands, but omits discussion of the broader societal context and the role of non-Jewish Dutch citizens in assisting or failing to assist Jews. It also doesn't explore in detail the reasons for the high mortality rate of Dutch Jews compared to other Western European countries. While acknowledging space constraints is reasonable, a brief mention of these elements would improve the narrative's completeness.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a dichotomy between the passive image of Dutch Jews during WWII and the active resistance highlighted in the book. While this contrast is useful to challenge assumptions, it may oversimplify the diverse responses within the Jewish community. The narrative doesn't fully represent the spectrum of experiences, potentially leaving the impression that all Jews either passively accepted fate or actively resisted.
Gender Bias
The article mentions women involved in the resistance but doesn't explicitly analyze gender roles or stereotypes. While the inclusion of women is positive, a more thorough assessment of gender dynamics within the resistance would strengthen the analysis. The examples given are balanced across genders.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights the resistance of Jewish people in the Netherlands during WWII against the Nazi regime. This active resistance, encompassing various forms from physical confrontation to acts of civil disobedience, directly challenges the oppressive regime and contributes to the struggle for justice and peace. The actions described, even if ultimately unsuccessful in preventing the Holocaust, represent a defiance of injustice and a fight for human rights, aligning with the core principles of SDG 16.