
nos.nl
Dutch Self-Employed Worker Numbers Decline Sharply After Disguised Employment Ban
The number of self-employed individuals in the Netherlands dropped by over 4,000 in January 2024 due to a new ban on disguised employment, impacting sectors like healthcare significantly, as companies transition self-employed workers to employee roles to avoid fines.
- What is the immediate impact of the ban on disguised self-employment in the Netherlands?
- The number of self-employed individuals (zzp'ers) in the Netherlands decreased by over 4,000 in January 2024, following a new ban on disguised employment. This drop was anticipated due to new regulations prohibiting companies from using individuals classified as self-employed while functionally acting as employees. Companies violating these rules face fines from the Dutch tax authority.
- How are companies like Careyn responding to the decrease in self-employed workers and the new regulations?
- The decline in self-employed workers is linked to a new law prohibiting disguised employment, where individuals are classified as self-employed but function as employees. This change impacts various sectors, with healthcare experiencing the most significant loss, nearly 2,000 self-employed workers in January alone. Companies are now transitioning these workers to employee status, sometimes offering flexible hours to attract them.
- What are the potential long-term economic and social consequences of this significant shift in the Dutch labor market?
- The shift from self-employment to traditional employment could significantly alter labor market dynamics in the Netherlands. While the overall decrease in self-employed individuals is not yet alarmingly high, the healthcare sector's substantial losses highlight potential workforce challenges. The long-term effects on service provision and labor costs remain uncertain, depending on companies' capacity to adapt.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The headline and introduction emphasize the decrease in self-employed individuals, framing it as a significant event. The article primarily focuses on the negative impacts of the new legislation, highlighting potential workforce shortages in healthcare and the challenges faced by Careyn. While the concerns are valid, the framing might not give enough attention to the positive aspects of the new regulations, such as better worker protections. The inclusion of quotes from individuals who transitioned from self-employment to traditional employment reinforces this negative framing.
Language Bias
The language used is generally neutral, however, terms like "onrust" (unease) and "verleidingen" (temptations) might carry slightly negative connotations, depending on the translation, subtly influencing reader perception. These words could be replaced with more neutral terms, such as "uncertainty" and "incentives.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses on the decrease in self-employed individuals in the Netherlands due to new regulations prohibiting sham self-employment. While it mentions the healthcare sector's significant loss of self-employed workers, it doesn't delve into the potential consequences for other sectors or the broader economic impact of this decrease. The perspectives of businesses other than Careyn and the experiences of self-employed individuals outside of healthcare are not included. This omission limits the complete understanding of the overall effect of the new regulations.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplistic eitheor choice between self-employment and traditional employment. While it highlights the benefits of stable employment as experienced by Sandra Schanck-Breukel, it doesn't fully explore the potential advantages of self-employment for those who choose it by their own will, such as flexibility and autonomy. This oversimplification may affect the reader's understanding of the complexities of employment choices.
Gender Bias
The article features two women, Heleen Poortvliet and Sandra Schanck-Breukel, whose perspectives are highlighted. While their experiences are relevant, the article doesn't explicitly address whether men's experiences are similar or different. To avoid bias, it would be helpful to include additional perspectives from men in the same situation.
Sustainable Development Goals
The decrease in the number of self-employed individuals (zzp