
dw.com
Earthquake-Resistant Construction: Lessons from Myanmar, Thailand, and Beyond
A 7.7 magnitude earthquake struck Myanmar and Thailand, causing building collapses and evacuations in Bangkok but no reported deaths; the article explores how earthquakes cause building failures and examines innovative construction methods for enhanced earthquake resilience.
- How do the forces generated during an earthquake affect building structures, and what building materials are most vulnerable?
- Earthquakes generate forces that stretch, compress, or shear buildings. Traditional materials like brick and rock, while strong under compression, fail under shear stress, leading to collapse. Steel's flexibility makes it ideal for earthquake-resistant building skeletons, while lightweight roofs minimize injuries from falling debris.
- What is the primary cause of death during earthquakes, and how did this factor into the recent earthquake affecting Myanmar and Thailand?
- The recent 7.7 magnitude earthquake in Myanmar and Thailand, while causing building collapses and evacuations in Bangkok, resulted in no reported deaths. Building collapses, primarily due to shearing forces on walls and roofs, are the leading cause of earthquake fatalities, not ground shaking itself. This highlights the critical need for earthquake-resistant construction.
- What innovative building techniques can enhance earthquake resilience, and what cost-effective strategies are being implemented in different regions?
- Future earthquake resilience depends on adopting innovative construction techniques. Base isolation systems, while costly, effectively decouple buildings from ground motion. Cost-effective alternatives include using reinforced concrete, bamboo in smaller structures, and incorporating materials like straw bales and recycled materials. 3D-printed concrete offers customization for earthquake-resistant designs.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the issue primarily through the lens of building construction and engineering solutions. While this is important, it overshadows other crucial aspects such as governmental regulations, building codes, and the socio-economic factors that influence building practices and access to safer housing. The focus on technological solutions might inadvertently minimize the role of broader societal changes needed for improved earthquake resilience.
Language Bias
The language used is generally neutral and informative. The article avoids sensationalism and maintains a relatively objective tone throughout. There is some use of strong adjectives such as "devastating", but these are used in the context of describing the earthquake's effects and not to express any biased opinion.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses primarily on building construction and earthquake resilience, neglecting other significant aspects of earthquake preparedness and response, such as emergency response systems, public awareness campaigns, and post-earthquake recovery efforts. While acknowledging limitations of scope, the omission of these crucial elements creates an incomplete picture of earthquake safety.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a false dichotomy by implicitly suggesting that the only solution to earthquake-related deaths is improved building construction. It overlooks other vital factors, such as effective early warning systems and evacuation plans, which are also crucial in mitigating casualties.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights the development and implementation of earthquake-resistant building techniques, directly contributing to safer and more resilient communities, especially in areas prone to seismic activity. These advancements mitigate the risk of building collapse and associated casualties, improving the safety and well-being of urban populations. Examples include the use of steel reinforcement in concrete, lightweight roofing materials, base isolation systems, and innovative construction methods like 3D-printed concrete houses. These directly improve the resilience of urban areas to natural disasters.