dw.com
Earth's Unexpected Speed: Shortest Day Recorded in 2025
On August 5th, 2025, Earth experienced one of its shortest days ever recorded, rotating 1.25 milliseconds faster than usual due to an unexplained acceleration since 2020, posing challenges for time-dependent technologies and raising the possibility of a negative leap second.
- What are the competing hypotheses explaining the long-term acceleration of Earth's rotation since 2020?
- Since 2020, Earth's rotation has inexplicably accelerated, defying the long-term trend of gradual slowdown caused by the Moon's gravitational pull. This acceleration, marked by several days in 2025 shorter than 24 hours, poses challenges for systems reliant on precise timekeeping, such as GPS and banking systems. The Moon's position, while offering a short-term explanation for some shorter days, doesn't fully account for the overall trend.
- What are the immediate consequences of Earth's accelerated rotation on globally synchronized systems and infrastructure?
- On August 5th, 2025, Earth completed its rotation 1.25 milliseconds faster than usual, making it one of the shortest days recorded since 1973. This minuscule difference, while imperceptible to humans, significantly impacts time-sensitive systems worldwide. Scientists are baffled by this acceleration, as Earth's rotation has historically slowed down.
- What are the potential long-term implications of a negative leap second on global technological infrastructure and how likely is this event?
- The continued acceleration of Earth's rotation could necessitate a 'negative leap second' by 2029, a measure never before implemented and potentially disruptive to software and technology globally. The cause remains uncertain, with hypotheses ranging from changes in the Earth's core to the effects of climate change, highlighting the complexity of Earth's systems and the limitations of our current understanding.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article presents the information in a relatively neutral and objective manner. While it highlights the unusual nature of the Earth's accelerating rotation, it avoids sensationalizing the phenomenon or pushing a specific narrative. The use of quotes from experts adds credibility and further reinforces the objective tone.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral and objective. The article uses precise scientific terminology where appropriate, and avoids emotionally charged language or subjective opinions. The only potential area for improvement would be to replace phrases such as "inquietante" (inquietud) which could be seen as slightly subjective, opting instead for a more neutral description such as "unusual" or "unexpected.
Bias by Omission
The article provides a comprehensive overview of the Earth's accelerating rotation, including various potential causes and their implications. However, it could benefit from mentioning potential counterarguments or alternative interpretations of the existing theories. For instance, while the article discusses the theory of the Earth's core slowing down, it would be valuable to include any dissenting opinions or studies that challenge this hypothesis. Similarly, mentioning limitations in our current understanding of the Earth's core and its interactions with other layers would add nuance.